首页|Wiltse与后正中入路经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的安全性及近期效果研究

Wiltse与后正中入路经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的安全性及近期效果研究

扫码查看
目的 比较分析Wiltse与后正中入路经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(TLIF)治疗腰椎间盘突出症(LDH)的安全性及近期效果。方法 回顾性分析2019-01-2022-12 于郑州大学第二附属医院骨一科行TLIF治疗的 86 例LDH患者的临床资料,根据手术入路方式分为Wiltse组(38 例)和后正中组(48 例)。比较2 组患者的基线资料。记录手术时间、术中出血量、下床活动时间。评估术前、术后6 个月患者的腰椎功能JOA评分和数字评定量表(NRS)评分。结果 2 组患者的基线资料差异无统计学意义(P>0。05)。Wiltse组的手术时间、下床活动时间均短于后正中组,术中出血量少于后正中组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0。05)。术前 2 组患者的JOA、NRS评分差异均无统计学意义(P>0。05);术后6 个月时,Wiltse组患者的JOA评分高于后正中组,NRS评分低于后正中组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0。05)。2 组患者的并发症发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0。05)。结论 经Wiltse入路与后正中入路实施TLIF,均有良好的安全性和近期效果。但Wiltse入路改善腰椎功能、缓解疼痛的效果更佳,且手术时间短、术中出血量少,更利于患者术后康复。
Safety and short-term effects study of Wiltse and posterior median approach lumbar interbody fusion surgery for treatment of lumbar disc herniation
Objective To compare and analyze the safety and short-term effects of Wiltse and posterior median approach transforami-nal lumbar interbody fusion(TLIF)for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation(LDH).Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on 86 patients with LDH who underwent TLIF treatment in the Department of Orthopedics at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from January 2019 to December 2022.The patients were divided into the Wiltse approach group(Wiltse group,38 patients)and the posterior median approach group(posterior median group,48 patients)according to the surgical approach.The baseline data of the two groups were com-pared,and the operation time,intraoperative blood loss,and time to ambulation were recorded.The lumbar spine function before and 6 months af-ter surgery were evaluated,and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association(JOA)score and Numeric Rating Scale(NRS)score were compared.Results Therewas no significant difference in baseline data between the two groups(P>0.05).The operation time and time to ambulation in the Wiltse group were shorter than those in the posterior median group,and the intraoperative blood loss was less than that in the posterior medi-an group,with statistical significance(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in JOA and NRS scores between the two groups before sur-gery(P>0.05).At 6 months after surgery,the JOA score in the Wiltse group was higher than that in the posterior median group,and the NRS score was lower than that in the posterior median group,with statistical significance(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the inci-dence of complications between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion Both Wiltse and posterior median approaches TLIF can improve lum-bar spine function and relieve pain in patients with LDH,and they are both safe.However,the Wiltse approach TLIF has better effects in impro-ving lumbar spine function and relieving pain,with shorter operation time and less intraoperative blood loss,which is beneficial for postoperative rehabilitation.

Lumbar disc herniationWiltse approachPosterior median approachTransforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

郭淼勇、张明生、来秋山、高文飞

展开 >

郑州大学第二附属医院骨科 郑州 450014

腰椎间盘突出症 Wiltse入路 后正中入路 经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术

2024

河南外科学杂志
郑州大学

河南外科学杂志

影响因子:0.709
ISSN:1007-8991
年,卷(期):2024.30(3)
  • 9