首页|CT灌注参数在急性脑梗死患者侧支状态及溶栓后出血转化评估中的应用

CT灌注参数在急性脑梗死患者侧支状态及溶栓后出血转化评估中的应用

扫码查看
目的 探讨CT灌注参数在急性脑梗死患者侧支状态及溶栓后出血转化评估中的价值.方法 选取急性脑梗死患者 100 例作为研究对象,根据是否发生出血转化将其分为出血组(n=48)和未出血组(n=52).均进行CT灌注检查,并记录患者侧支循环状态的 CT灌注成像参数.比较 2 组患者的 CT灌注参数相对脑血容量(rCBV)、相对脑血流量(rCBF)、相对平均通过时间(rMTT)以及相对达峰时间(rTTP).比较出血组患者的患侧及健侧的rCBV、rCBF、rMTT以及 rTTP 水平,并采用多因素 logistic 逻辑回归分析上述指标的独立预后情况.结果 出血组患者的 rCBV和 rCBF水平均小于未出血组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);出血组患者的 rTTP 水平高于未出血组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);2 组患者 rMTT水平差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);出血组患者的患侧 rCBV 和 rCBF水平均小于健侧,患侧的 rMTT和 rTTP 高于健侧,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).多因素 logistic 回归分析显示,rCBV、rCBF以及 rTTP 均可作为独立溶栓后出血转化的预测因素(P<0.05),其中 rCBV、rCBF 越小则独立溶栓后出血转化程度越大,rTTP 越大则独立溶栓后出血转化程度越大,而 rMTT 无法作为独立溶栓后出血转化的预测因素(P>0.05).结论 CT灌注参数中的 rCBV、rCBF以及 rTTP 均可作为急性脑梗死患者侧支状态及溶栓后出血转化评估的指标,为患者进行个性化治疗提供一定的临床指导意义.
Application of CT Perfusion Parameters in Evaluating Collateral Status and Hemorrhagic Transformation after Thrombolysis in Patients with Acute Cerebral Infarction
Objective To explore the application value of CT perfusion parameters in evaluating collateral status and hemorrhagic transformation after thrombolysis in patients with acute cerebral infarction.Methods A total of 100 patients with acute cerebral infarction were selected as the research objects and divided into a bleeding group(n=48)and a non-bleeding group(n=52)according to whether hemorrhagic transformation occurred.CT perfusion examinations were performed on all patients,and the CT perfusion imaging parameters of the collateral circulation status of the patients were recorded.The relative cerebral blood volume(rCBV),relative cerebral blood flow(rCBF),relative mean transit time(rMTT),and relative time to peak(rTTP)of CT perfusion parameters were compared between the two groups.The rCBV,rCBF,rMTT,and rTTP of the affected side and the healthy side of the patients in the bleeding group were compared,and multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the independent prognostic conditions of the above indicators.Results The rCBV and rCBF of patients in the bleeding group were smaller than those in the non-bleeding group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The rTTP of patients in the bleeding group was higher than that in the non-bleeding group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in rMTT between the two groups(P>0.05).The rCBV and rCBF on the affected side of patients in the bleeding group were smaller than those on the healthy side,and the rMTT and rTTP on the affected side were higher than those on the healthy side.The difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that rCBV,rCBF,and rTTP could all be used as predictors of independent hemorrhagic transformation after thrombolysis(P<0.05).The smaller the rCBV and rCBF,the greater the degree of independent hemorrhagic transformation after thrombolysis.The larger the rTTP,the greater the degree of independent hemorrhagic transformation after thrombolysis.However,rMTT could not be used as a predictor of independent hemorrhagic transformation after thrombolysis(P>0.05).Conclusion rCBV,rCBF,and rTTP among different parameters of CT perfusion can be used to evaluate collateral status and hemorrhagic transformation after thrombolysis in patients with acute cerebral infarction,providing certain clinical guiding significance for personalized treatment of patients.

acute cerebral infarctionCT perfusion parameterscollateral statushemorrhagic transformation after thrombolysiscerebral blood volumecerebral blood flow

徐罗、刘东清、翟跃杰

展开 >

濮阳油田总医院 放射科,河南 濮阳 457001

濮阳油田总医院 全科医疗科,河南 濮阳 457001

急性脑梗死 CT灌注参数 侧支状态 溶栓后出血转化 脑血容量 脑血流量

2024

河南医学高等专科学校学报
河南职工医学院

河南医学高等专科学校学报

影响因子:0.467
ISSN:1008-9276
年,卷(期):2024.36(5)