首页|数字平台自我优待:行为类型与法律规制

数字平台自我优待:行为类型与法律规制

扫码查看
数字平台的健康发展、做优做强须强化反垄断监管,而自我优待是数字平台反垄断的重点之一.作为一个伞状概念,自我优待不宜泛化讨论,应将其限定在平台内部讨论,具体指"双角色平台"对平台内自营商业活动的优待.自我优待的实践样态可分为三个类型,即算法操纵型、数据利用型、平台规则支持型,不同类型的自我优待有不同的行为特征.自我优待存在"双轮垄断"的反竞争性,会对其他经营者、消费者、创新产生竞争损害,其法律规制既不可失之于宽也不能失之于严,应采用行为主义理论,着重分析行为效果,坚持惩戒性规制与激励性规制相统一,鼓励并引导数字平台就自我优待行为建立合规审查机制.
Self-preferencing of Digital Platforms:Behavior Types and Legal Regulations
The healthy development,optimization and strength of digital platforms require strengthening antitrust supervi-sion,and self-preferencing is one of the key points of digital platform antitrust.As an umbrella concept,self-preferencing should not be generalized and should be limited to internal discussions within the platform,specifically referring to the pref-erential treatment given by the"dual role platform"to self-operated commercial activities within the platform.The practice patterns of self-preferencing can be divided into three types,namely algorithm manipulation,data utilization,and platform rule support.Different types of self-preferencing have different behavioral characteristics.Self-preferencing has the anti-competitive nature of a"dual-wheel monopoly",which can cause competitive damage to consumers and other operators.Its legal regulations cannot be lenient or strict.Behaviorism theory should be adopted,with a focus on analyzing the effects of behavior,adhering to the unity of punitive and incentive regulations,and encourage and guiding digital platforms to estab-lish compliance review mechanisms for self-preferential behavior.

digital platformself-preferencingdual-wheel monopolyalgorithmdata

周梦懿

展开 >

澳门科技大学法学院

广东金融学院保险学院

清远市北江生态经济带高质量发展研究基地(广东 广州 510521)

数字平台 自我优待 双轮垄断 算法 数据

2024

华侨大学学报(哲学社会科学版)
华侨大学

华侨大学学报(哲学社会科学版)

CHSSCD
影响因子:1.024
ISSN:1006-1398
年,卷(期):2024.(2)
  • 55