首页|自动化决策权利对抗体系的完善——《个人信息保护法》第24条的解释论进路

自动化决策权利对抗体系的完善——《个人信息保护法》第24条的解释论进路

扫码查看
《个人信息保护法》在第24条规定了包括免于自动化决策约束权在内的诸多对抗算法的请求权类型.但本规范存在法律性质不清、概念内涵模糊、利益关系失衡以及程序性救济手段缺失等问题.第24条兼具禁止性规定和权利性规定的性质;就具体规范内涵而言,其中"重大影响"限于对信息主体之权利义务存在实质性负面影响;"用户画像"不仅限于基于个人信息的个体用户画像,而且也包括基于相同或者相似群体的用户画像;"决策公平合理"要求数据处理者在数据处理过程中承担合理分析义务;另外,个性化推送也应当纳入广义自动化决策的概念之中.在此基础上,从实体层面和程序层面继续完善自动化决策请求权对抗体系.
Perfection of the Rights Confrontation Mechanism of Automatic Decision-making:the Interpretative Path to Article 24 of The Personal Information Protection Law
Article 24 of The Personal Information Protection Law(Draft)stipulates many types of claim rights,including the right to be free from automatic decision-making constraints.However,the legal nature of this code is unclear,the concept connotation is vague,the interest relationship is unbalanced,and the procedural relief means are missing.Article 24 has the nature of both prohibitive provisions and rights provisions.In terms of the specific normative connotation,the"significant impact"is limited to the substantive impact on the rights and obligations of the data subject;"user portrait"is not limited to individual user portraits based on personal data,but also includes user portraits based on the same or similar groups;"fair and reasonable decision-making"requires data processors to undertake the obligation of reasonable analysis in the process of data processing;in addition,individualized automated push should also be incorporated into the concept of generalized automated decision-making.On this basis,it is necessary to continue to improve the automatic decision-making claim confrontation system from the entity level and procedure level.

automated decision makinguser profilingsignificant impactNot to be subjected to automatic decision-making

牛彬彬、陈永波

展开 >

湖州师范学院经济管理学院,浙江湖州 313000

上海市第三中级人民法院,上海 201203

自动化决策 用户画像 重大影响 免于自动化决策约束权

浙江省软科学研究计划

2023C35001

2024

湖州师范学院学报
湖州师范学院

湖州师范学院学报

影响因子:0.301
ISSN:1009-1734
年,卷(期):2024.46(3)
  • 37