摘要
《大正新修大藏经》第85册和《敦煌本古佚与疑伪经校注——以<大正藏>第八十五册为中心》均对部分敦煌佛经文献进行了校录,后者是在前者校录的基础上重新进行了整理,纠正了前录文中的大量错误,但仍存在误录、缺录、漏录、误补、误倒的问题.针对《小乘戒律注疏》《法华义记卷第三》《维摩经义记卷第四》三种佛经注疏录文中的这五类失误,共择取20例,试作考释.
Abstract
The records of some Dunhuang Buddhist Sutras are found in Volume 85 of the Taisho Tripitaka(大正藏)and in-The Correction of Dunhuang Lost and Suspected Buddhist Scriptures:Focusing on Volume 85 of the Taisho Tripitaka(敦煌本古佚与疑伪经校注——以大正藏第八十五册为中心).The latter rearranges the former,addressing numerous errors in the original recordings.However,it also contains issues such as misrecording(误录),missing recording(缺录),omission(漏录),incor-rect supplementation(误补),and misplaced entries(误倒).Focusing on Annotations on Hinayana Precepts(小乘戒律注疏),Volume 3 of Fa Hua Yi Ji(法华义记),and Volume 4 of Wei Mo Yi J(维摩义记),this paper examines 20 examples to analyze and explain these five types of problems.
维普
万方数据