长期照护人员分级评价指标体系的构建
Construction of A Grading Evaluation Indicator System for Long-term Caregivers
张露心 1傅卓凡 1张涛梅 1文稀 1李惠玲1
作者信息
- 1. 苏州大学苏州医学院护理学院,江苏苏州 215006
- 折叠
摘要
目的 构建长期照护人员分级评价指标体系,为不同层级照护人员的准入、考核与培训提供参考.方法 通过文献回顾和半结构访谈初拟长期照护人员分级评价指标,采用德尔菲法进行2轮函询,采用层次分析法计算指标权重.结果 长期照护员评价指标体系包括5个一级指标,17个二级指标,85个三级指标;照护师评价指标体系包括5个一级指标,19个二级指标,73个三级指标;照护督导评价指标体系包括5个一级指标,17个二级指标,59个三级指标.2轮专家积极系数为100％、95％,专家权威系数为0.863、0.862,肯德尔和谐系数为0.064,0.171(均P＜0.001).结论 构建的长期照护人员分级评价体系具有科学性和可靠性,可为长期照护人员的分级考核与培训提供参考.
Abstract
Objective To construct a grading evaluation indicator system for long-term caregivers,so as to provide references for the admission,assessment,and training of them at different levels.Methods Through literature review and semi-structured interviews,the evaluation indicator system for long-term caregivers was initially constructed,and the Delphi method was used to execute 2 rounds of inquiry.The an-alytic hierarchy process was used to calculate the weights of indicators.Results The grading evaluation in-dicators system of long-term caregivers included 5 first-level indicators,17 second-level indicators,and 85 third-level indicators;that of senior caregivers included 5 first-level indicators,19 second-level indicators,and 73 third-level indicators;that of tutoring caregivers included 5 first-level indicators,17 second-level in-dicators,and 59 third-level indicators.The expert positivity coefficient of 2 rounds were 100％and 95％,the expert authority coefficients of 2 rounds 0.863 and 0.862,respectively,and the Kendall's W coefficients 0.064 and 0.171(all P＜0.001).Conclusions The grading evaluation indicator system is scientific and relia-ble,which can provide reference for the grading assessment and training of long-term caregivers.
关键词
长期照护人员/分级/评价指标/德尔菲法/层次分析法Key words
long-term caregiver/grading/evaluation indicator/Delphi method/analytic hierarchy process引用本文复制引用
基金项目
国家自然科学基金(72074164)
老年长期照护教育部重点实验室项目()
出版年
2024
NETL
NSTL
维普
万方数据