军事护理2024,Vol.41Issue(5) :81-84.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2097-1826.2024.05.020

生产性参与量表的汉化及信效度检验

Chinese Version of Productive Engagement Scale:Reliability and Validity

代霜霜 赵明利 王雪 卓艺佳 赵文雅
军事护理2024,Vol.41Issue(5) :81-84.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2097-1826.2024.05.020

生产性参与量表的汉化及信效度检验

Chinese Version of Productive Engagement Scale:Reliability and Validity

代霜霜 1赵明利 2王雪 1卓艺佳 1赵文雅1
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 郑州大学护理与健康学院,河南郑州 450000
  • 2. 复旦大学附属上海市第五人民医院 护理部,上海 200240
  • 折叠

摘要

目的 汉化生产性参与量表并进行信效度检验.方法 基于Brislin模型及跨文化调适指南对该量表进行翻译、回译、跨文化调适及预调查,便利抽取郑州市429名社区老年人进行信效度及Rasch模型分析.结果 中文版生产性参与量表具有单维性,包含9个条目,各条目的加权均方拟合均值为1.00(0.64~1.38),未加权均方拟合均值为1.02(0.59~1.44);条目信度为0.98,分离指数为7.53;量表内容效度为0.89,Cronbach's α系数为0.92.结论 中文版生产性参与量表信效度较好,可用于社区老年人生产性参与的测量.

Abstract

Objective To translate the Productive Engagement Scale(PES)into Chinese,and to test its re-liability and validity.Methods The PES was translated,re-translated,cross-culturally adapted and pre-sur-veyed based on Brislin model and Guidelines for the Cross-Cultural Adaptation.The convenience sampling method was used to select 429 elderly people from communities in Zhengzhou city for the analysis of relia-bility and validity,and Rasch model analysis.Results The Chinese version of PES was unidimensional and contained 9 items.The Infit(average)value was 1.00(0.64~1.38),and the Outfit(average)value was 1.02(0.59~1.44).The item reliability of this scale was 0.98 and the separation index was 7.53.The scale-con-tent validity index was 0.89.The Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.92.Conclusions The Chinese version of the Productive Engagement Scale has good reliability and validity,and can be used to measure the pro-ductive engagement of the elderly people in communities.

关键词

生产性参与/信度/效度

Key words

productive engagement/reliability/validity

引用本文复制引用

出版年

2024
军事护理
第二军医大学

军事护理

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.628
ISSN:2097-1826
参考文献量15
段落导航相关论文