首页|博尔顿疼痛评估工具的汉化及其在认知障碍患者中的信效度检验

博尔顿疼痛评估工具的汉化及其在认知障碍患者中的信效度检验

Chinese Version of Bolton Pain Assessment Tool and Its Reliability and Validity Testing Among Patients with Cognitive Impairment

扫码查看
目的 对博尔顿疼痛评估工具进行汉化,并检验其在认知障碍患者中的信效度.方法 经翻译、文化调试及预试验后,形成中文版博尔顿疼痛评估工具.便利抽样法选取2023年9~12月镇江市某三级甲等医院神经外科、神经内科收治的49例认知障碍患者进行正式调查,并检验其信度和效度.结果 中文版博尔顿疼痛评估工具包括发声/言语和面部表情等6个条目,以及照料者的意见和物理治疗时的疼痛两项附加内容.量表内容效度为0.920,量表总分与Wong-Baker总分呈正相关(r=0.787);量表Cronbach's α系数为0.717,评估者间信度为0.940.结论 中文版博尔顿疼痛评估工具具有良好的信度和效度,可为临床诊疗中认知障碍患者的疼痛评估提供参考工具.
Objective To translate the Bolton Pain Assessment Tool into Chinese and test its reliability and validity for patients with cognitive impairment.Methods After translation,cultural adaptation and pre-test,the Chinese version of Bolton Pain Assessment Tool was formed.The convenience sampling meth-od was used to select a total of 49 patients with cognitive impairment admitted to the Department of Neu-rosurgery and Neurology of a tertiary A hospital in Zhenjiang City from September to December 2023 for formal investigation.The reliability and validity were tested.Results The Chinese version of Bolton Pain Assessment Tool contained 6 items,including vocal/verbal and facial expressions,and 2 additional items,including caregiver's opinions and patients'pain during physical therapy.The content validity of the scale was 0.920.The total score of the scale was positively correlated with the total score of Wong-Baker(r=0.787).The Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.717 and the inter-rater reliability was 0.940.Conclusions The Chinese version of Bolton Pain Assessment Tool has good reliability and validity,and can provide a refer-ence tool for pain assessment of patients with cognitive impairment in clinical diagnosis and treatment.

cognitive impairmentpain assessmentBolton Pain Assessment Toolreliabilityvalidity

周琪、王宜庭、杨细虎、邹圣强

展开 >

江苏大学附属医院麻醉科,江苏镇江 212001

江苏大学附属医院 口腔科

江苏大学附属镇江三院重症医学科,江苏镇江 212009

认知障碍 疼痛评估 博尔顿疼痛评估工具 信度 效度

2024

军事护理
第二军医大学

军事护理

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.628
ISSN:2097-1826
年,卷(期):2024.41(9)