首页|基于电磁弹式索力传感器的悬索桥短吊索索力检测

基于电磁弹式索力传感器的悬索桥短吊索索力检测

扫码查看
采用传统索力测试方法进行短吊索索力测试的精度难以满足工程需求.本文以棋盘洲长江公路大桥悬索桥荷载试验为工程依托,提出基于磁弹原理及磁电效应的电磁弹式索力传感器检测吊索索力的方法,并与有限元分析结果以及频率法、应变法测试结果进行对比.结果表明,试验标定误差小于±2%,在荷载试验中,传统索力测试方法对吊索的测量误差偏大,采用电磁弹式索力传感器更为准确地测量了短吊索索力,解决了短吊索索力的测量难题.荷载试验的吊索索力测试结果表明,索力增量的测试值与分析值偏差小于±5%,实际索力的测试值与分析值偏差小于±4%.
Application of Elasto-Magneto-Electric(EME)Sensor for Short Suspender Cable Force Measurement in Suspension Bridge
The accuracy of traditional cable force testing methods for short suspension cables is unable to meet engineering requirements.This paper proposed the elasto-magneto-electric(EME)sensor with the magnetoelastic principle and magnetoelectric effect to complete the cable force monitoring of short suspenders,based on the suspension bridge load test of Qipanzhou Yangtze River Highway Bridge.The measurement results obtained from EME sensor were compared with the finite element analysis value and the measurement results from the traditional cable force sensor.The results show that experimental calibration error of EME sensor is less than±2%,in the loading test,the measurement error of the traditional cable force sensor for the short suspender is relatively large,and the EME sensor can more accurately measure the increment of the cable force,which breaks through the difficulty of measuring the cable force of the short suspender.The results of the suspension cable force measurement with the EME sensor in the load test show that the deviation between the test value and the analysis value of cable force increment in field load test is less than±5%,and the deviation between the actual cable force test value and its analysis value is less than±4%.

elasto-magneto-electric sensorssuspender cableloading testcable force measurement

沈伟、张伟山、魏巍、段元锋、段元昌

展开 >

湖北交投智能检测股份有限公司,武汉 430050

浙江大学建筑工程学院,杭州 310058

杭州健而控科技有限公司,杭州 310030

电磁弹索力传感器 悬索桥吊索 荷载试验 索力检测

国家重点研发计划国家自然科学基金国家自然科学基金浙江省自然科学基金

2019YFE01126005237831852361165658LHZ23E080003

2024

结构工程师
同济大学,华东建筑设计研究院

结构工程师

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.51
ISSN:1005-0159
年,卷(期):2024.40(3)
  • 22