时间检验视角下两种修复技法在特定破损古籍上的应用成效对比研究——以《加减灵秘十八方》的修复为例
A Comparative Study on the Application Effectiveness of Two Restoration Techniques in Specific Damaged Ancient Books from the Perspective of Time Testing——A Case Study of the Restoration of Modified Lingmi 18 Prescriptions
潘健 1纪景超 1穆笛2
作者信息
- 1. 金陵图书馆,江苏 南京 210019
- 2. 新加坡佛教居士林,新加坡 239329
- 折叠
摘要
古籍修复技法的合理选择与运用对于古籍修复工作而言至关重要.从时间检验的视角对13年前同时运用了手工纸浆修补法和传统局部修补法的古籍进行了实验修复过程回溯,并对修复13年后的古籍再次进行了形态数据检测和成效分析对比,进而从修补速度、书叶纸张的平整度、厚度、酸碱度,收缩度、牢固度,以及纤维的均匀度等方面进行重点论述,总结出两种修复技法的优势与局限,从而进一步验证了两种技法在特定破损古籍上运用的科学性和合理性.
Abstract
The reasonable selection and application of ancient book restoration techniques are crucial for the work of ancient book restoration.The article retrospectively examines the experimental restoration process of ancient books that were repaired 13 years ago using both manual pulp repair method and traditional local repair method from the perspective of time testing.After 13 years of restoration,the shape data of the ancient books were tested and the ef-fectiveness was analyzed and compared again.The article focuses on the repair speed,flatness,thickness,acidity and alkalinity of the book leaves and paper,shrinkage,firmness,and uniformity of the fibers.The advantages and limitations of the two restoration techniques are summarized to further verify the scientific and rational application of the two techniques on specific damaged ancient books.
关键词
手工纸浆修补法/局部修补法/古籍修复成效Key words
handmade pulp repair method/local repair method/the effectiveness of ancient book restoration引用本文复制引用
出版年
2024
NETL
NSTL
万方数据