首页|全球碳减排的历史逻辑与中国的政策选择

全球碳减排的历史逻辑与中国的政策选择

扫码查看
碳减排目标形成的历史过程体现了必然性与阶段性的辩证统一.在人类社会推进碳排放治理、处理发展与环境关系的长期探索中,碳减排技术的突破性发展起了核心和基础作用,市场机制发挥了有效的调节和促进功能.根据全球碳减排必然性与阶段性逻辑的启示,中国在推进"双碳"目标中要处理好发展与碳减排的关系,主要思路建议是:把握好实现"双碳"目标的阶段性工作重点,推动经济社会、碳减排技术和新能源产业协调发展;处理好推进碳减排与产业结构变动的关系,防止产业结构过早服务化或轻型化;加强碳减排技术的研发、应用和推广,更好发挥技术的促进作用;处理好碳减排中政府与市场的关系,推进碳减排的模式变革;积极参与应对碳排放的全球治理,提升气候治理问题的中国话语权.
Historical Logic of Global Carbon Reduction and China's Policy Choice
The formation of global carbon reduction targets is underpinned by an internal logic,manifesting the dialectical unity of necessity and stage.Throughout the long-term quest of advancing carbon emissions governance and reconciling the interplay between development and environment,pioneering advancement in carbon reduction technologies has assumed a pivotal and foundamental role,and market mechanisms have played an effective role in regulation and stimulation.Drawing upon this analysis,it is imperative for China to balance the relationship between development and carbon reduction in advancing carbon peaking and carbon neutrality goals.This paper provides the following policy implications:Firstly,grasp the key priorities of the phased goal towards achieving carbon reduction to enhance the coordinated development of economic society,carbon reduction technologies,and the new energy sector.Secondly,handle the relationship between carbon reduction and industrial restructuring to prevent premature serviceization or lightweighting of industrial structure.Thirdly,enhance the research,development,implementation,and dissemination of carbon reduction technologies to better exert the positive influence.Fourthly,deal with the relationship between the government and the market in carbon emissions abatement,fostering the model transformation of carbon reduction.Finally,take an active role in the international domain of carbon governance to augment China's discourse power in climate governance issues.

Carbon PeakingCarbon NeutralityHistorical LogicPolicy Choice

郭克莎、余丽晴

展开 >

华侨大学经济与金融学院,362021

碳达峰 碳中和 历史逻辑 政策选择

国家社会科学基金重大项目

20&ZD087

2024

经济评论
武汉大学

经济评论

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:1.49
ISSN:1005-3425
年,卷(期):2024.245(1)
  • 34