首页|央行沟通"简明—专业"权衡与公众行动

央行沟通"简明—专业"权衡与公众行动

扫码查看
更加注重与公众沟通是现代中央银行制度的特点之一.然而面对缺乏经济学知识的普通公众,央行应如何权衡沟通语言的简明性与专业性?首先,本文建立基于个体异质性信息处理能力的沟通模型.在模型中,使用更多专业概念能更准确地描述经济基本面,但也同时增加了公众的信息处理成本,阻碍公众获得共同知识.理论分析表明,央行沟通存在最佳沟通专业性(或简明性)使得公众行动分歧最小或社会福利最大.然后,本文手动构建中国货币政策词典,应用于测度沟通文本专业性,基于微博大数据和高频股价数据,证实微博分歧和股票价格分歧均与央行沟通专业性是U型关系.通过区分微博中专家与普通人群体,本文发现专家对专业性沟通的接受能力更强,论证了异质性信息处理能力假设的合理性.本文结论有助于央行通过平衡简明性与专业性实现更有效的公众沟通.
"Simplicity-Professionalism"Trade-Off of Central Bank Communication and the Public Actions
Communication has emerged as a crucial tool for central banks in managing expectations.In recent years,there has been a transformation in the communication strategies of central banks,with a greater emphasis on engaging with the general public.The People's Bank of China has also adopted a diversified approach to policy communication,thereby effectively managing and guiding public expectations.In the theoretical framework of rational expectations,it is assumed that the public can comprehend any information without incurring costs,thereby advocating for enhanced accuracy to minimize communicating efficiency losses.Actu-ally,the general public often struggles to understand professional communication from central banks due to a lack of fi-nancial knowledge.Current practices among central banks worldwide aimed at the general public primarily focus on sim-plifying language.Empirical studies also underscore the importance of reducing the use of professional terminology to en-hance understanding.While professional expressions may create barriers to understanding,the issue of information distor-tion resulting from overly simplified communication should not be overlooked,as both can contribute to increased public disagreement and reduced social welfare.How should central banks balance the simplicity and professionalism of com-munication with the necessary level of professionalism when communicating with the general public?This paper begins with a theoretical perspective,introducing individual heterogeneous processing costs of public in-formation within the framework of the"beauty contest"model characterizing the degree of information professionalism by the quantity of professional concepts.While the increase in professional concepts enhances information precision and reduces public understanding discrepancies,it simultaneously raises comprehension costs.Consequently,the number of the general public capable of understanding professional information gradually declines,resulting in a lack of common knowledge,which exacerbates public disagreement.The theoretical model suggests that central banks face a"simplicity-professionalism"trade-off.Theoretically,there exists optimal professionalism to minimize public disagreement,accord-ing to which this paper puts forward a hypothesis:public disagreement and the central bank's communication profession-alism show a U-shaped relationship.In the empirical part,we manually compile a lexicon of Chinese monetary policy terms to measure the professionalism of communication texts by the frequency of occurrence of professional monetary policy terms.Utilizing big data from Weibo and high-frequency stock price data,we confirm that both Weibo divergence and stock price divergence exhibit a U-shaped relationship with the professionalism of central bank communication.By distinguishing between experts and the general public on Weibo,this study finds that experts demonstrate a higher capac-ity to accept professional communication,thereby substantiating the rationality of the heterogeneous information process-ing capability hypothesis of the theoretical model.The marginal contributions of this paper are as follows.First,it supplements the theoretical literature advocating that central banks should strive to enhance information precision by introducing the concept of heterogeneous information pro-cessing costs,suggesting that excessively high professionalism may impede the public's understanding of public informa-tion,ultimately hindering the reduction of public disagreement.Second,it adds to the empirical literature emphasizing the positive effects of simplifying central bank communication by demonstrating that excessive simplicity can lead to a de-cline in the precision of public information,thereby expanding public action disagreement.Consequently,this paper chal-lenges the binary perspective of the theoretical and empirical literature,bridging the gap between the two.Both excessive and insufficient professionalism can have negative impacts.Third,this study offers rich policy implications concerning the adjustment of communication strategies,real-time evaluation of communication effectiveness,and the establishment of a sustainable communication mechanism.

Central Bank CommunicationPublic DisagreementsInformation Processing CostHigh-Frequency Data Event Study

吕之安、刘莉亚、谭姝颖、闵敏

展开 >

西南大学经济管理学院

上海财经大学金融学院,邮政编码:400715

上海财经大学金融学院,邮政编码:200433

重庆理工大学经济金融学院

上海财经大学金融学院,邮政编码:400054

展开 >

央行沟通 公众分歧 信息处理成本 高频事件研究法

2024

经济研究
中国社会科学院经济研究所

经济研究

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:4.821
ISSN:0577-9154
年,卷(期):2024.59(11)