健康大视野·医学分册2023,Issue(4) :4-6.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-0019.2023.04.002

C反应蛋白与血常规检测在门诊呼吸道感染中的应用效果

孔维红 梁婷玉 王士然
健康大视野·医学分册2023,Issue(4) :4-6.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-0019.2023.04.002

C反应蛋白与血常规检测在门诊呼吸道感染中的应用效果

孔维红 1梁婷玉 1王士然1
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 兖州区人民医院,山东 济宁 272100
  • 折叠

摘要

目的:对比在门诊呼吸道感染中实施血常规检测与C反应蛋白检测法的效果.方法:研究对象选取时间为2022年1月份-2022年10月份,选取150例在医院门诊被确诊的呼吸道感染患者,纳入到观察组,细菌感染50例,病毒感染50例,支原体感染50例;同时选取于同时间在医院中接受健康体检的50例患者,纳入到对照组.结果:联合诊断方法检测阳性率明显高于单一血常规和单一CRP指标(P < 0.05).白细胞计数、中性粒细胞计数、单核细胞百分比、单核细胞计数、CRP指标观察组高于对照组(P < 0.05).结论:在门诊呼吸

Abstract

Objective To compare the efficacy of routine blood test and C-reactive protein test in outpatient respiratory tract infection. Methods: The study subjects were selected from January 2022 to October 2022.150 patients with respiratory tract infection confirmed in the hospital outpatient department were selected and included in the observation group; 50 cases of bacterial infection, 50 cases of virus infection and mycoplasma 50 cases of mycoplasma infection; 50 patients who received physical examination in the hospital at the same time were included in the control group. Results: The positive rate of combined diagnosis was significantly higher than that of single blood routine and single CRP index (P < 0.05). The white blood cell count, neutrophil count, monocyte percentage, monocyte count and CRP index in observation group were higher than those in control group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The diagnostic effect of C-reactive protein in outpatient respiratory tract infection is obviously better than that of blood routine diagnosis, and the accuracy of disease diagnosis is high, so it is recommended for clinical detection of disease.

关键词

呼吸道感染/血常规/C反应蛋白/阳性率

Key words

respiratory tract infection/Blood routine/C-reactive protein/Positive rate

引用本文复制引用

出版年

2023
健康大视野·医学分册
中国保健协会

健康大视野·医学分册

ISSN:1005-0019
参考文献量10
段落导航相关论文