健康大视野·医学分册2023,Issue(12) :30-31.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-0019.2023.12.013

剑突下单孔胸腔镜与三孔胸腔镜前纵隔肿瘤切除的临床疗效对比

程子明
健康大视野·医学分册2023,Issue(12) :30-31.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-0019.2023.12.013

剑突下单孔胸腔镜与三孔胸腔镜前纵隔肿瘤切除的临床疗效对比

程子明1
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 临沂市中心医院胸外科,山东 临沂 276400
  • 折叠

摘要

目的:比较剑突下单孔胸腔镜与三孔胸腔镜前纵隔肿瘤切除的临床疗效.方法:研究以我院2020年5月-2023年5月临床收治行前纵隔肿瘤切除术患者110例为研究对象,随机分组方式将其划分为对照组与观察组,分别采用三孔胸腔镜与剑突下单孔胸腔镜进行治疗,每组患者55例,比较组间临床治疗效果.结果:观察组术中出血量、术后引流时间、住院时间以及镇痛次数均低于对照组,统计学意义成立(P<0.05);术前观察组与对照组组间VAS与生活质量评分不具有统计学意义(P>0.05),术后24h两组VAS评分均上升,但观察组低于对照

Abstract

Objective To compare the clinical effect of single-hole thoracoscope under xiphoid and three-hole thoracoscope. Methods: With 110 patients undergoing mediastinal tumor resection from May 2020 to May 2023, divided into control group and observation group, three-hole thoracoscope and single-hole thoracoscope were used respectively, 55 patients in each group to compare the clinical treatment effect between groups. Results: The blood loss, postoperative drainage time, hospital stay, and analgesia frequency were lower than the control group (P <0.05); The VAS scores of both groups increased 24h after surgery, but the observation group was lower than the control group, and the observation group was lower than the control group, and the statistical significance between the groups was established (P <0.05); the scores of the observation group was higher than that of the control group (P <0.05).Conclusion: The application value of single-hole thoracoscopy under xiphoid is higher in anterior mediastinal tumor resection, which can improve the general situation of patients'' surgery, reduce the pain degree, and improve the postoperative quality of life of patients after surgery. It is suggested that clinical use is promoted.

关键词

剑突下/单孔胸腔镜/三孔胸腔镜/前纵膈肿瘤

Key words

subxiphoid/single-hole thoracoscope/three-hole thoracoscope/anterior mediastinal tumor

引用本文复制引用

出版年

2023
健康大视野·医学分册
中国保健协会

健康大视野·医学分册

ISSN:1005-0019
参考文献量12
段落导航相关论文