首页|司法裁判视角下资管产品增信措施法律问题研究

司法裁判视角下资管产品增信措施法律问题研究

扫码查看
增信措施的法律性质和效力问题在司法实践中一直存在争议,最高人民法院试图通过发布《九民纪要》以及《担保解释》来梳理概念、统一裁判.然而,资管领域作为专业化的金融领域,无论是产品设计结构还是独特的"投资"以及"风险"特质,都不同于一般民商事交易.因此,资管产品增信措施的定性不宜完全遵照《担保解释》第36条的认定思路,而应该更多尊重当事人的意思自治,将其认定为独立的无名合同.在增信措施的效力认定上,需要明确刚性兑付的违法性基础是违反了信托财产的独立性原则,监管目的是防范系统性金融风险.
Research on Legal Issues of Credit Enhancement Measures for Asset Management Products from the Perspective of Judicial Judgment
The legal nature and effectiveness of credit enhancement measures have always been controversial in judicial practice.The Supreme People's Court tried to sort out the concept and unify the judgment by issuing the"Nine people's Records"and"Guarantee Interpretation".However,as a professional financial field,the asset management field is different from the general civil and commercial transactions,whether it is the product design structure or the unique"investment"and"risk"characteristics.Therefore,the qualitative measures of credit enhancement of asset management products should not follow the identification ideas of article 36 of the Guarantee Interpretation,but should respect the autonomy of the parties and identify them as independent anonymous contracts.In terms of the validity of credit enhancement measures,it is necessary to clarify that the illegality of rigid payment is a violation of the independence principle of trust property,and the purpose of supervision is to prevent the emergence of systemic financial risks.

asset management productscredit enhancement measureslegal naturerigid payment

林孝景

展开 >

华东政法大学经济法学院,上海市 200050

资管产品 增信措施 法律性质 刚性兑付

2024

吉林金融研究
中国人民银行长春中心支行

吉林金融研究

CHSSCD
影响因子:0.418
ISSN:1009-3109
年,卷(期):2024.(4)