Quantification of Work Indicators:High Intensity Mobilization and Challenges of Township Governments in the Context of Multi Center Work
In recent years,with the enhancement of national capacity,the country has set multiple governance goals in rural areas,which has formed a multi center work pattern at the grassroots.Faced with the pressure of multi center work,quantifying work indicators comprehensively is not only an important institutional tool for superiors to assess subordinates,but also an increasingly important means for township governments to achieve high-intensity mobilization of internal staff in townships.The comprehensive quantification of work indicators mainly manifests in the simultaneous quantification of results and processes for work indicators with quantifiable completion results,as well as the quantification of processes for work indicators with non quantifiable completion results.By leveraging the computability,decomposability,and comparability of work tasks contained in quantitative work indicators,townships can fully activate mechanisms such as accountability,accounting supervision,and face saving incentives to achieve high-intensity mobilization of township cadres and improve the efficiency of task execution.However,this mobilization method that relies on quantifying work task indicators also brings difficulties such as excessive mobilization and operation of townships,as well as the breeding of formalism and suspension of grassroots political power.To solve this dilemma,it is necessary to change the multi center work pattern of grassroots governments,maintain a simple state of grassroots governance,reduce the burden on grassroots governments,and at the same time give them a certain degree of autonomous governance space to enhance their social responsiveness.
multi center worktownship governancetownship mobilizationquantification of indicatorshigh-intensity mobilization
NETL
NSTL
万方数据
