Reasonable Household Debt Promotes Shared Development:Empirical Evidence Based on Consumption Inequality
In recent years,the overall consumption inequality of Chinese households has shown an expanding trend,and consumption inequality in China has been close to or even higher than income inequality in some years.Analyzing the influencing factors behind consumption inequality and taking targeted measures to curb the widening of consumption inequality among residents is of great practical significance for accelerating the construction of a new development pattern of"dual circulation",promoting high-quality economic development in China,improving residents'well-being,and achieving shared development among residents.The conclusions drawn from existing research on the impacts of debt on consumption inequality are inconsistent and current research on nonlinear effects has not calculated a specific"turning point".In addition,few studies empirically test the mechanism of household debt on consumption inequality from the perspectives of income inequality and income shock.This article is based on CHFS panel data from 2015 to 2019,using the consumer relative deprivation index to measure consumption inequality at the household level,and using the one-period lagged borrowing cost as an instrumental variable for household debt,exploring the impacts of Chinese household debt on consumption inequality.This article empirically tests the heterogeneous effects of reasonable and excessive debt from the perspective of financial fragility and calculates the threshold for excessive debt for each household.It is found that household debt only helps to reduce consumption inequality when the monthly debt repayment of the household is below or equal to this threshold.The mechanism test shows that a reasonable increase in household debt scale can significantly reduce household consumption inequality by reducing income inequality faced by households and alleviating the negative impact of temporary income shocks on household consumption.Heterogeneity analysis reveals that the increase in the debt for consumption-smoothing motivation,the debt for social-status goods,and housing debt all contribute to reducing household consumption inequality,while the debt for investment has no significant impact on consumption inequality.The increasing debt-to-asset ratio of households with high financial literacy and entrepreneurial backgrounds has a greater inhibitory effect on consumption inequality,and only the increase in the debt of households with healthy heads of households can help reduce consumption inequality.The thresholds for excessive debt vary due to household heterogeneous characteristics.This article has the following marginal contributions.(1)It analyzes the heterogeneous effects of reasonable and excessive debt on consumption inequality from the perspective of financial fragility for the first time,providing a new perspective for studying household consumption inequality in China and calculating the threshold for excessive debt.(2)This article is the first empirical study in China to explore the mechanism of household debt affecting consumption inequality from the perspectives of income inequality and temporary income shocks.Using Chinese household data,this article verifies the important conclusions drawn from the life cycle-persistent income theory and the precautionary savings theory,providing new perspectives for the mechanism research of debt affecting consumption inequality.(3)This article conducts heterogeneity tests from the perspectives of different debt motivations,financial literacy,health status,and whether households are entrepreneurial,providing empirical evidence for a profound understanding of the debt behavior of Chinese households and seeking policy measures to alleviate household consumption inequality.
household debtconsumption inequalityrelative deprivation of consumptionfinancial fragilityincome inequality