首页|论"套路贷"诈骗犯罪的司法限缩

论"套路贷"诈骗犯罪的司法限缩

扫码查看
"套路贷"不具有罪名概念的规范性和类型性,不可能成为刑法上独立的类罪名.受打早打小黑恶势力刑事政策影响,实务机关倾向于以"套路贷"典型行为取代诈骗罪构成要件,将"套路"与欺骗行为对等、忽视欺骗行为与认识错误的因果关系、通过客观行为直接推定主观目的的做法都将模糊罪与非罪的界限.涉"套路贷"诈骗犯罪的司法认定需要坚持诈骗罪基本构造要件,在行为人与被害人两个层面对客观与主观两个维度进行双重评价,准确认定套路贷诈骗犯罪.应当在法秩序统一立场上判断被害人是否存在"财产损失",选择与民法不冲突的财产损失认定标准,出借人设立虚假债权后不能认为已成立犯罪或实现既遂.
On the Judicial Restriction of"Trick Loan"Fraud Crime
"Trick loan"does not have the standardization and type of the concept of crime,and it cannot become an independent crime in criminal law.Based on the influence of the criminal policy value of cracking down on the gangsters and evil forces,the practical organs tend to replace the judgment of the constitutive elements of the fraud with the typical behavior of"trick loan".The equivalence of tricks and deception,the neglect of the causal relationship between deception and cognitive errors,and the direct presumption of subjective purpose through objective behavior will blur the boundary between crime and non-crime.The judicial determination of the crime of routine loan fraud needs to adhere to the basic structure of the crime of fraud,and make a double evaluation of the objective and subjective dimensions at the two levels of the perpetrator and the victim,so as to accurately determine the crime of routine loan fraud.It is necessary to judge whether the victim has"property loss"from the perspective of the unity of legal order.It is difficult to affirm that the lender has established a crime or achieved accomplishment after setting up a false claim.

the crime of"trick loan"deceptionpurpose of illegal possessionproperty loss

秦雨田、刘双阳

展开 >

中国政法大学刑事司法学院

"套路贷"犯罪 欺骗行为 非法占有目的 财产损失

2024

江苏警官学院学报
江苏警官学院

江苏警官学院学报

CHSSCD
影响因子:0.19
ISSN:1672-1020
年,卷(期):2024.39(2)