首页|生成式人工智能虚假信息的刑事风险与法律应对

生成式人工智能虚假信息的刑事风险与法律应对

扫码查看
生成式人工智能自发或在人为引导下有生成和传播虚假信息的风险.针对生成式人工智能自发产生虚假信息的负外部性,由于在新过失论前提下服务提供者对规章义务的违反已受到相关治理规范的规制,在刑事责任的设置上宜参照拒不履行信息网络安全管理义务罪,将生成式人工智能服务提供者解释为新型网络服务提供者,为其拒不履行生成式服务规范义务产生的严重后果承担刑事责任.针对生成式人工智能存在被用作犯罪工具触发编造及传播虚假信息的潜在风险,传统罪名足以规制,但具体交叉罪名需从犯罪客体和犯罪行为明确区分适用.在追究生成式人工智能编造传播虚假信息的法律责任时宜弱化量化标准的适用效力.
The Criminal Risk and Legal Response of Artificial Intelligence False Information
Generative artificial intelligence carries the risk of generating and disseminating false information spontaneously or under human guidance.In view of the negative externalization of false information spontaneously generated by generative artificial intelligence,since the violation of regulatory obligations by service providers under the premise of new negligence has been regulated by relevant governance norms,it is advisable to refer to the crime of refusing to perform the obligation of information network security management in the setting of criminal responsibility.The generative artificial intelligence service provider is interpreted as a new type of network service provider,and it is criminally responsible for the serious consequences of its refusal to perform the obligation of generative service specification.Traditional charges are sufficient to regulate the potential risk of using generative artificial intelligence as a criminal tool to trigger the fabrication and dissemination of false information,but specific cross charges need to be clearly distinguished and applied from the criminal object and the criminal behavior.When investigating the legal responsibility of generative artificial intelligence for fabricating and disseminating false information,it is advisable to weaken the effectiveness of quantitative standards.

generative artificial intelligencefalse informationcriminal riskthe subject of responsibility

龚鹏程、傅成璐

展开 >

河海大学法学院

生成式人工智能 虚假信息 刑事风险 责任主体

2024

江苏警官学院学报
江苏警官学院

江苏警官学院学报

CHSSCD
影响因子:0.19
ISSN:1672-1020
年,卷(期):2024.39(3)
  • 20