首页|自动电位滴定法检测水中总碱度的应用

自动电位滴定法检测水中总碱度的应用

扫码查看
研究进行手工滴定法和自动电位滴定法检测水中总碱度的方法对比分析,对空白样品、质控样品和不同类型实际水样的总碱度进行检测,所有检测结果均符合试验要求,检测结果可靠.检测空白样品计算出手工滴定法检出限为2.4 mg/L,测定下限为9.5 mg/L.自动电位滴定法检出限为0.5 mg/L,测定下限为2.1 mg/L,明显低于手工滴定法.检测不同浓度质控样品,自动电位滴定法相对标准偏差≤0.46%,相对误差≤0.22%,手工滴定法相对标准偏差≤1.46%,相对误差≤2.79%;对实际样品进行平行双样分析,自动电位滴定法相对偏差为0.05%~0.43%,手工滴定法相对偏差为0~2.99%,皆可表明自动电位滴定法有更好的精密度和准确度,检测结果更稳定.对33组实际水样检测结果进行配对t检验,结果为P=0.146(>0.05),表明两种方法无显著差异.手工滴定法不同人员间检测结果相对偏差为0.30%~2.03%,人员偏差明显.对不同浑浊度水样进行加标回收试验,手工滴定法加标回收率为90.0%~108.0%,自动电位滴定法加标回收率为95.8%~104.2%.55 NTU以下水样摇匀和静置后检测结果间相对偏差,手工滴定法<3.7%,自动电位滴定法<1.5%,表明是否摇匀对检测结果无明显影响.相比于手工滴定法易被检测人员熟练程度、专业技术水平、对颜色敏感程度等因素影响,自动电位滴定法更能兼顾准确性和工作效率,实现智能化检测.生活饮用水领域需要尽快弥补总碱度国家标准方法空缺.
Application of Automatic Potentiometric Titration in Determination of Total Alkalinity in Water
This paper compared and analyzed the methods of manual titration and automatic potentiometric titration to detect the total alkalinity in water.The total alkalinity of blank samples,quality control samples and different types of actual water samples were tested.All test results were within the test requirements and the test results were reliable.Detection of blank samples calculated the detection limit of manual titration method was 2.4 mg/L and the determination limit was 9.5 mg/L.The detection limit of automatic titration was 0.5 mg/L,and the determination limit was 2.1 mg/L,which was significantly lower than that of manual titration.For the detection of quality control samples of different concentrations,the relative standard deviation of automatic potentiometric titration was less than or equal to 0.46%,and relative error was less than or equal to 0.22%.The relative standard deviation of manual titration was less than or equal to 1.46%,and relative error was less than or equal to 2.79%.Parallel double-sample analysis of actual samples showed that the relative deviation of automatic potentiometric titration was from 0.05%to 0.43%.The relative deviation of the manual titration method was from 0 to 2.99%,which indicated that the automatic potentiometric titration method had better precision and accuracy,and the detection results were more stable.The paired t-test was performed on 33 groups of actual water samples,and the result was P=0.146(>0.05),indicating that there was no significant difference between the two methods.The relative deviation of the detection results of different personnel by manual titration method was from 0.30%to 2.03%,and the personnel deviation was obvious.The recovery rates of water samples with different turbidity was from 90.0%to 108.0%by manual titration and from 95.8%to 104.2%by automatic potentiometric titration.The relative deviations between the measured results of water samples below 55 NTU was less than 3.7%by manual titration and less than 1.5%by automatic potentiometric titration.Whether it was shake well or not has not has no significant effect on the test results.Compared with the manual titration method,which is easily affected by factors such as the proficiency of detection personnel,professional technical level,and color sensitivity,the automatic potentiometric titration method can take into account the accuracy and work efficiency,and realize intelligent detection.The field of drinking water needs to fill the gap in the national standard method of total alkalinity as soon as possible.

total alkalinityautomatic potentiometric titrationmanual titrationhigh turbidity water sampleintelligent detection

李沛镡、张雨晨

展开 >

国家城市供水水质监测网北京监测站,北京 100101

北京市自来水集团有限责任公司水质监测中心,北京 100101

总碱度自 动电位滴定法 手工滴定法 高浑浊度水样 智能化检测

2024

净水技术
上海市净水技术学会,上海市城乡建设和交通委员会科学技术委员会办公室

净水技术

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.643
ISSN:1009-0177
年,卷(期):2024.43(8)
  • 9