首页|《民法典》高空抛物规则价值意蕴与适用重塑

《民法典》高空抛物规则价值意蕴与适用重塑

扫码查看
《中华人民共和国民法典》(简称《民法典》)1254条"高空抛物规则"吸收了原《中华人民共和国侵权责任法》(简称《侵权责任法》)第87条"补偿责任"规则的同时,又以增加建筑物管理人安全保障义务与公安等机关介入条款,对原有的高空抛物规则作出了实质性变更,实际上放弃了先前《侵权责任法》在高空抛物问题上的强调救济功能的立场,转而追求社会总体利益的更大化以及矫正正义与分配正义的平衡实现。基于此,高空抛物规则的适用要点也需要根据其价值意蕴的改变而获重塑:明确补充责任在先、补偿责任在后的责任担当次序,同时拓展"补偿责任"规则细化的空间,并明确公安机关为解决民事纠纷介入调查与实施治安处罚、追究刑事责任的区分。
The Value Implication and Reshaping Application of Rule for Falling Objects in Civil Code of the People's Repubice of China
Article 1254 of Civil Code of the People's Repubice of China,which is known as"rule for falling and throwing objects from high-rise buildings",has undergone substantial changes as it not only absorbed the"indemnification obligation"defined in Article 87 of the previous Tort Law of the People's Republic of China,but also included the additional terms on property management's safety guarantee obligation and public security authorities'investigating and ascertaining liability.In practical terms,it has abandoned the previous position of emphasizing the relief function as it turned to a better social welfare and a balanced realization of corrective justice and distributive justice.So,the application of this article needs to be reshaped according to the change of its values.It should be made clear that indemnification obligation follows secondary liability,while the indemnification obligation should be further detailed,and the public security units'investigation for solving civil dispute be distinguished from that for imposing punishments for public security and criminal responsibility.

falling and throwing objects from high-rise buildingsindemnification obligationsafety guarantee obligationeconomic analysisvalue pursuit

王殷舟

展开 >

南京师范大学法学院

高空抛物 补偿责任 安全保障义务 经济分析 价值追求

司法部法治建设与法学理论研究部级科研项目

20SFB051

2024

江苏大学学报(社会科学版)
江苏大学

江苏大学学报(社会科学版)

CHSSCD
影响因子:0.528
ISSN:1671-6604
年,卷(期):2024.26(3)
  • 36