首页|直接口服抗凝药与低分子肝素治疗癌症相关静脉血栓栓塞患者有效性和安全性的Meta分析

直接口服抗凝药与低分子肝素治疗癌症相关静脉血栓栓塞患者有效性和安全性的Meta分析

扫码查看
目的:比较直接口服抗凝药(DOACs)与低分子肝素(LMWH)在癌症相关静脉血栓栓塞(CAT)患者中的有效性和安全性。方法:在PubMed、the Cochrane Library、EMB ASE、中国知网、万方和维普数据库进行检索,搜集DOACs与LMWH在治疗CAT中的随机对照试验(RCT)和队列研究。采用Revman 5。4。1软件进行Meta分析。结果:共计纳入26篇研究(7篇RCT,19篇队列研究;共27 920患者)。无论RCT还是队列研究,两组的大出血、临床复合终点事件方面差异均无统计学意义(P>0。05);DOACs较LMWH的再发静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)发生率更低(P<0。05),但临床相关非大出血(CRNMB)发生率更高(P<0。05)。RCT中,两组全因死亡风险差异无统计学意义(P>0。05)。而队列研究中,DOACs降低了全因死亡风险(P<0。05)。亚组分析发现,在胃肠道癌症中,虽然DOACs的再发VTE风险更低,但增加了大出血风险;而非胃肠道癌症中两组再发VTE和大出血发生率差异均无统计学意义。采用阿哌沙班时,LMWH再发VTE风险更高,而采用利伐沙班时,其与LMWH再发VTE和大出血的风险无差异。结论:在CAT患者中,DOACs的再发VTE风险低于LMWH,CRNMB风险更高,但不增加其大出血风险,提示DOACs是LMWH的合理替代方案,尤其是阿哌沙班,但需警惕胃肠道癌症患者的大出血风险。
Meta Analysis of Efficacy and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants and Low-molecular-weight Heparin in the Treatment of Cancer-related Venous Thromboembolism in Patients
Objective:The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of direct oral antico-agulants(DOACs)and low-molecular-weight Heparin(LMWH)in patients with cancer-related venous throm-bosis(CAT).Methods:Databases including Pubmed,the Cochrane Library,EMBASE,CNKI,WanFang and VIP were searched for RCT and cohort studies of DOACs and LMWH in the treatment of CAT.Literature screening,data extraction and quality evaluation were conducted using the Revman 5.4.1 software for meta-analysis.Results:A total of 26 studies(7 RCT and 19 cohort studies pooled 27920 patients)were includ-ed.RCT or cohort studies,there were no statistically significant differences in major bleeding and clinical composite endpoint event between the two groups(P>0.05);the rate of recurrent venous thromboembolism(VTE)in DOACs was lower than that in LMWH(P<0.05),but the rate of clinically relevant non major bleeding was higher(P<0.05).In RCT,there was no statistically significant difference in risk of all-cause mortality between the two groups(P>0.05).In cohort studies,DOACs reduced the risk of all-cause mor-tality(P<0.05).Subgroup analysis found that when patients with gastrointestinal cancer,although DOACs had a lower risk of recurrent VTE,it increased the risk of major bleeding;however,there was no statisti-cally significant difference in rates of recurrent VTE and major bleeding between the two groups in non gastrointestinal cancer patients.When using apixaban,the rate of recurrent VTE in LMWH was higher,while using rivaroxaban,there was no statistically significant difference in rates of recurrent VTE and major bleeding compared to LMWH.Conclusion:In CAT patients,the risk of recurrent VTE in DOACs is lower than that in LMWH,and the risk of clinically related non major bleeding is higher,but it does not in-crease the risk of major bleeding;DOACs,especially apixaban,are reasonable alternatives to LMWH,but caution should be exercised regarding the risk of major bleeding in patients with gastrointestinal cancer.

Cancer related venous thrombosisDirect oral anticoagulantsLow molecular weight hep-arinMeta analysis

王佩、汤沂、陈晓燚、魏萌、周强、陶瑛瑛

展开 >

中国人民解放军东部战区总医院药剂科,南京 210002

中国人民解放军东部战区总医院心血管内科,南京 210002

中国人民解放军东部战区总医院临床药学科,南京 210002

癌症相关静脉血栓 直接口服抗凝药 低分子肝素 Meta分析

2024

药学与临床研究
江苏省药学会

药学与临床研究

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.95
ISSN:1673-7806
年,卷(期):2024.32(6)