首页|大学学科治理的现实困境及路径超越

大学学科治理的现实困境及路径超越

扫码查看
大学学科的知识生产经历了从学科自治下的知识生产模式1向"三维螺旋"与"行政主导"下的知识生产模式2再向多元主体与多方共治下的知识生产模式3的转变.伴随着大学知识生产向模式3的转型,我国大学学科行政主导的治理方式面临着制约多元主体作用发挥、难以适应学科要素发展、影响学科文化体系重塑等现实困境.基于此,在我国大学学科治理方式改革中,应积极呼应知识生产模式3的现实需要,优化多元主体参与学科治理的顶层设计、构筑差异化和个性化的学科治理方式、打造传统与创新并存的学科文化体系,为一流学科建设提供制度保障.
The Practical Dilemma of University Discipline Governance and the Path to Surpass
The knowledge production of university disciplines has undergone a transformation from the knowledge production Mode 1(the discipline autonomy)to the knowledge production Mode 2(the"three-di-mensional spiral"and"administrative dominance"),and then to the knowledge production Mode 3(the multi-subject and muti-governance).With the transition from knowledge production to Mode 3,the governance mode of discipline administration in Chinese universities is faced with a realistic dilemma of restricting the role of multiple subjects,being difficult to adapt to the development of subject elements,and affecting the recon-struction of discipline culture system.Based on this,the reform of discipline governance in Chinese universities should actively respond to the practical needs of knowledge production Mode 3,optimize the top-level design of multi-subject participation in discipline governance,build differentiated and personalized discipline gover-nance,and create a discipline culture system with both tradition and innovation,so as to provide institutional guarantee for the construction of first-class disciplines.

knowledge production modefirst-class disciplinediscipline governanceuniversity gover-nance

刘玉杨、何振海

展开 >

河北大学 教育学院,河北 保定 071002

知识生产模式 一流学科 学科治理 大学治理

国家社会科学基金教育学一般课题

BOA220187

2024

高教发展与评估
武汉理工大学 中国交通教育研究会 高教研究分会

高教发展与评估

CHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:0.776
ISSN:1672-8742
年,卷(期):2024.40(1)
  • 16