首页|文学伦理学批评的批评理路研究

文学伦理学批评的批评理路研究

扫码查看
文学伦理学批评按照历史分析先行、话语主导分析阐释、道德教诲功能价值结论的理路开展实际批评。历史分析先行,既包含现实的历史语境,也指涉文学作品中虚构出的历史语境;话语引导式分析阐释,能够使文学伦理学批评把握文学作品中与伦理相关的事件、情节和结构,并根据文学作品中的道德行为、道德现象总结出能够引起读者警戒、启发读者反思的道德案例,以此为依据阐发文学的道德教诲价值。不过,需要指出的是,一味强调复归历史的伦理环境和伦理语境,容易忽视文学对当今时代的价值启示,而话语引导式分析模式容易留给读者一种预设立场和强制阐释的印象,似乎其观点、结论早已在分析阐释前形成。若是局限在话语引导式分析模式,陷入话语和文本相互印证的窠臼,忽视了文学批评应有的价值评价,文学伦理学批评的效用就会大打折扣。
Research on the Critical Path of Literary Ethical Criticism
Literary ethical criticism is conducted through a logical path that involves historical analysis,discourse-led anal-ysis and interpretation,and conclusions about the functional value of moral instruction.Historical analysis,which includes both the real historical context and the fictional historical context within literary works,takes precedence.Discourse-guided analysis and interpretation enable literary ethical criticism to grasp events,plots,and structures related to ethics in literary works.Based on the moral actions and phenomena in the literature,it summarizes moral cases that can alert and inspire readers to reflect,thereby explicating the moral instructional value of literature.However,it should be noted that an exces-sive emphasis on returning to the historical ethical environment and context risks overlooking the contemporary value of lit-erature.The discourse-guided analysis model may leave readers with the impression of a predetermined stance and forced interpretation,seemingly forming its viewpoints and conclusions before the analysis and interpretation.If confined to this discourse-guided analysis model and falling into the trap of mutual validation between discourse and text,ignoring the value evaluation that literary criticism should possess,the effectiveness of literary ethical criticism will be compromised.

literary ethical criticismhistorical backgrounddiscourse analysismoral instruction

屈冬

展开 >

南昌师范学院,江西南昌 330032

文学伦理学批评 历史背景 话语分析 道德教诲

国家社会科学基金项目

22BZW003

2024

南昌师范学院学报
江西教育学院

南昌师范学院学报

CHSSCD
影响因子:0.308
ISSN:1005-3638
年,卷(期):2024.45(1)
  • 6