首页|连州不同晒黄烟品种的综合评价

连州不同晒黄烟品种的综合评价

扫码查看
为解决连州晒黄烟品种单一、种性退化等问题,以青梗、8126、塘蓬、连选1号、密托为试验材料,调查分析上述品种的农艺性状、经济性状、化学成分、感官质量和外观质量等指标,以期引进和筛选出适宜连州传统晒黄烟试验点的优质晒黄烟品种.结果表明,不同试验点适宜的晒黄烟品种不同,星子试验点中连选1号的产量和有效叶数最多,ECI、CCUI和感官质量得分表现较突出;孔塘试验点则以密托的适应性最好,在孔塘种植的产量最高,有效叶数最多,因此ECI和外观质量得分较为突出.综合质量得分表明,星子试验点以连选1号为最高,孔塘试验点以密托为最佳.
Comprehensive Evaluation of Different Yellow Sun-cured Tobacco Varieties in Lianzhou
In order to solve the problems of single variety and variety degeneration of yellow sun-cured tobacco in Lianzhou,Qinggen,8126,Tangpeng,Lianxuan 1 and Mituo were used as test materials to investigate and analyze the agronomic traits,economic traits,chemical composition,sensory quality and appearance quality of these varieties,so as to introduce and screen the high-quality yellow sun-cured tobacco varieties suitable for the traditional yellow sun-cured tobacco test sites in Lianzhou.The results showed that the suitable yellow sun-cured tobacco varieties were different in different test sites.The yield and effective leaf number of Lianxuan 1 in Xingzi experimental site were the highest,and ECI,CCUI and sensory quality were the most outstanding,while the adaptability of Mituo in Kongtang experimental site was the best,The yield was the highest,and the number of effective leaves was also the most.The ECI score was higher,and the appearance quality was more outstanding.The comprehensive quality indicated that the comprehensive index of Lianxuan 1 in Xingzi experimental site was the highest while that of Mituo in Kongtang experimental site was the best.

LianzhouYellow sun-cured tobaccoVarietySensory qualityComprehensive evaluation

黄瑞寅、杨天乐、李红星、黄凯祥、蓝军、严锦申、吴向、张金霖、王维

展开 >

广东中烟工业有限责任公司,广东 广州 510610

广东烟草清远市有限公司,广东 清远 511515

华南农业大学 农学院,广东 广州 510642

连州 晒黄烟 品种 感官质量 综合评价

广东中烟工业有限责任公司科技计划资助项目

2022440000340008

2024

江西农业学报
江西省农业科学院 江西省农学会

江西农业学报

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.632
ISSN:1001-8581
年,卷(期):2024.36(8)