首页|经颅多普勒超声发泡试验与经胸右心声学造影在卵圆孔未闭诊断中的价值

经颅多普勒超声发泡试验与经胸右心声学造影在卵圆孔未闭诊断中的价值

扫码查看
目的 探讨经颅多普勒超声发泡试验(c-TCD)与经胸右心声学造影(c-TTE)在卵圆孔未闭(PFO)诊断中的价值.方法 选择2022年1月至2023年9月华东师范大学附属芜湖医院收治的疑似PFO患者119例,常规行经胸超声心动图(TTE)检查,同步完成c-TCD、c-TTE检查.以经食管超声心动图右心声学造影(c-TEE)为PFO诊断金标准,比较c-TCD与c-TTE在PFO诊断中的价值.结果 c-TCD、c-TTE在静息状态下和在Valsalva动作下对心脏右向左分流(RLS)检出率比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);与静息状态相比,在Valsalva动作下c-TCD、c-TTE对RLS的检出率均显著提高(P<0.05).在静息状态下,c-TTE与c-TCD量化RLS分流等级比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),其中c-TCD对大量分流更有诊断优势;在Valsalva动作下,c-TTE与c-TCD量化RLS分流等级差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).c-TTE与c-TCD检出RLS半定量分级比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).共有33例患者完成c-TEE,以c-TEE为诊断PFO金标准,c-TTE诊断PFO的灵敏度为88.9%、特异度为83.3%、约登指数0.72,c-TCD诊断PFO的灵敏度96.3%、特异度66.7%、约登指数0.63.c-TCD与c-TTE联合诊断PFO的灵敏度为100.0%.结论 在Valsalva动作下c-TTE及c-TCD对PFO的检出率均提高,在静息状态下c-TCD对RLS的分流等级量化更有优势.c-TCD诊断PFO的灵敏度高于c-TTE,特异度低于c-TTE,二者联合诊断PFO比其中任一种方法更有优势.
Contrast Enhanced Transcranial Doppler Sonography and Contrast Transthoracic Echocardiography in Diagnosing Patent Foramen Ovale:a Comparative Study
Objective To investigate the clinical value of contrast enhanced transcranial Doppler sonography(c-TCD)and contrast transthoracic echocardiography(c-TTE)in the diagno-sis of patent foramen ovale(PFO).Methods A total of 119 patients with suspected PFO admitted to Affiliated Wuhu Hospital of East China Normal University from January 2022 to September 2023 were selected for routine transthoracic echocardiography(TTE),and c-TCD and c-TTE were completed simultaneously.The diagnostic value of c-TCD and c-TTE for PFO was compared using contrast transesophageal echocardiography(c-TEE)as the gold standard for PFO diagnosis.Results There was no statistically significant difference in the detection rates of right-to-left shunt(RLS)between the resting state and the Valsalva maneuver with c-TCD and c-TTE(P>0.05);compared with the resting state,the detection rates of RLS were significantly higher in the Valsalva maneuver with c-TCD and c-TTE(P<0.05).In the resting state,the difference between c-TTE and c-TCD quantifying RLS shunt grades was statistically significant(P<0.05),with c-TCD being more diagnostic for large numbers of shunts;the difference between c-TTE and c-TCD quantifying RLS shunt grades was not statistically significant in the Valsalva maneuver(P>0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in the semiquantitative grading of RLS detected by c-TTE compared with c-TCD(P>0.05).A total of 33 patients completed c-TEE,with c-TEE as the gold standard for diagnosing PFO.c-TTE had a sensitivity of 88.9%,specificity of 83.3%,and Jordon's index of 0.72 for diagnosing PFO,while c-TCD had a sensitivity of 96.3%,specificity of 66.7%,and Jordon's index of 0.63.The combined diagnosis of PFO by c-TCD and c-TTE had a sensitivity of 100.0%.Conclusion Both c-TTE and c-TCD had increased detection of PFO in the Valsalva maneuver,and c-TCD was more advantageous in quantifying the shunt grade of RLS in the resting state.The sensitivity of c-TCD in diagnosing PFO was higher than c-TTE,the specificity was lower than c-TTE,and the combination of the two might be more advanta-geous than either method in diagnosing PFO

contrast enhanced transcranial Doppler sonographycontrast transthoracic echocardiographypatent foramen ovalediagnostic value

宋焱、于辉、耿峰

展开 >

华东师范大学附属芜湖医院(芜湖市第二人民医院)超声科,安徽芜湖 241000

经颅多普勒超声发泡试验 经胸右心声学造影 卵圆孔未闭 诊断价值

芜湖市科技成果转化项目

2021cg46

2024

南昌大学学报(医学版)
南昌大学

南昌大学学报(医学版)

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.008
ISSN:2095-4727
年,卷(期):2024.64(3)
  • 8