首页|R-454B与R-410A在北美定频管道机中的应用对比研究

R-454B与R-410A在北美定频管道机中的应用对比研究

扫码查看
通过实验对比研究了R-410A和R-454B在管道机中的最优充注量及二者在Afull和Bfull工况下各性能参数的差异,并分析了在管道机中利用R-454B批量替换R-410A的可行性.结果表明:R-410A和R-454B最优充注量分别为3 kg和3.65 kg.与R-410A相比,R-454B在Afull和Bfull工况下能力分别降低2.22%和2.64%,EER2分别提升2.76%和1.41%,排气温度分别降低3.9 ℃和4.7 ℃,回气温度分别降低6.0 ℃和5.2 ℃,冷凝压力分别降低6.35%和5.70%,蒸发压力分别降低2.10%和2.14%.说明R-454B基本可满足目前R-410A系统的能力能效要求,且R-454B对系统部件高温保护要求和强度要求均低于R-410A,R-454B可直接使用目前R-410A的系统,为管道机批量切换制冷剂做出参考.
Comparative study of R-454B and R-410A in air handler unit
The optimal charge amounts of R-410A and R-454B in Air Handler Unit(AHU)were compared through experimental studies,and the differences in various performance parameters under Afull and Bfull conditions were analyzed.The feasibility of replacing R-410A with R-454B in AHU was also assessed.The results indicated that the optimal charge amounts for R-410A and R-454B are 3 kg and 3.65 kg,respectively.Compared to R-410A,R-454B showed a capacity reduction of 2.22%and 2.64%under Afull and Bfull conditions,respectively,with an EER2 increase of 2.76%and 1.41%.Additionally,the discharge temperature decreased by 3.9 ℃ and 4.7 ℃,the suction temperature decreased by 6.0 ℃ and 5.2 ℃,the condensing pressure decreased by 6.35%and 5.70%,and the evaporating pressure decreased by 2.10%and 2.14%under the same conditions.These results suggest that R-454B can generally meet the capacity and energy efficiency requirements of current R-410A systems.Moreover,R-454B imposes lower high-temperature protection and strength requirements on system components compared to R-410A,indicating that R-454B can be directlv used in existing R-410A systems,a reference for the mass transition of refrigerants in AHU was provided.

R-410AR-454BGWPPerformanceRefrigerantEER2

戴子晴、杨文钧、杜超、赵凯强、邓璠、单体运

展开 >

青岛海尔科技有限公司 山东青岛 266100

数字家庭网络国家工程研究中心山东青岛 266100

青岛海尔空调器有限总公司 山东青岛 266100

R-410A R-454B GWP 性能 制冷剂 EER2

2024

家电科技
中国家用电器研究院

家电科技

影响因子:0.086
ISSN:1672-0172
年,卷(期):2024.5(5)