首页|论学位授予争议的学术复核制度

论学位授予争议的学术复核制度

扫码查看
为应对学位授予过程中的学术评价结论争议,《学位法》引入了学术复核制度.学术复核以"学术自由"作为理念基础,根据高校自主办学权力设立,能够巩固依据大学章程制定学术争议解决机制的合法性,完善高校学术治理和权利救济机制.在具体的制度设计上,学术复核组织应当具有专业性和自主、包容特征;在实施学术复核时,应当参照规范解释方法开展学术评价结论的合规性论证,同时侧重实体性审查并增强学术复核说理,做到以理服人、以法育人.学位授予单位在设计学术复核制度时,应当关注学术复核组织与学位评定委员会之间可能出现的权力运作冲突,并给出妥善处理方案.
Academic Review Mechanism for Controversial Degree Conferral
In response to disputes arising during the academic evaluation process for degree conferral,the Degree Law of PRC introduces an academic review mechanism.Based on the concept of"academic freedom,"academic review is established with the autonomy of universities and serves to strengthen the legitimacy of academic dispute resolution mechanisms in accordance with university charters,enhancing academic governance and rights relief mechanisms in higher education institutions.In terms of specific institutional design,academic review organizations should exhibit professionalism,autonomy,and inclusivity.When conducting academic reviews,they should adhere to normative interpretation methods to assess the compliance of academic evaluation conclusions.Furthermore,they should focus on substantive examination and strengthen the rationale behind academic review,aiming to persuade through reason and educate through the law.Degree-conferring institutions,when designing academic review mechanisms,should pay attention to potential power conflicts between academic review organizations and degree evaluation committees and provide suitable solutions.

Degree Lawdegree conferralacademic review

陈肇新

展开 >

华东师范大学法学院(上海 200241)

学位法 学位授予 学术复核

2024年度上海市教育法学人才培养计划项目

2023JYFXR066

2024

教育发展研究
上海市教育科学研究院 上海市高等教育学会

教育发展研究

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:1.416
ISSN:1008-3855
年,卷(期):2024.44(13)