菲律宾风灾我国与他国应急医疗队的对比分析
The comparison of China government emergency team with multinational rescue teams in Philippines typhoon disaster
蔡文伟 1石爱丽 1罗丽英 1闫广照1
作者信息
- 1. 310014 杭州,浙江省人民医院急诊科
- 折叠
摘要
目的 探讨菲律宾台风灾难救援中中国政府应急医疗队与多国救援队的差异.方法 收集中国政府应急医疗队及他国救援队人数、专业构成,到达及撤离时间等资料,对数据进行分析比较.结果 中国政府应急医疗队由50人组成,医疗与非医疗比为3.55∶1;医生与护士比为1.43∶1,灾后16 d到达灾区,停留10 d后撤离.共有90支各国救援队参与救援工作,每队平均26.51人.医疗与非医疗比为为2.12∶1,医生与护理比为1.27∶1.最早于灾后第2天到达,最迟是灾后17 d.最早撤离时间是抵达灾区后第2天,最迟撤离是到达后第150天,中位停留时间13 d.结论 中国政府应急医疗队人员偏多,医务人员比例偏高,后勤保障人员不足,今后应加强后勤保障人员配置.
Abstract
Objective To explore the differences between the Chinese Government Emergency Team (CGET) and the multinational rescue teams in Philippines typhoon disaster.Methods The relevant data of CGET were analyzed and compared with the multinational rescue teams,in respect of the personnel composition,the arrival time and the stayed time.Results There were 50 members in CGET.The ratio between medical and non-medical personnel was 3.55∶ 1,the ratio between doctors and nurses was 1.43∶ 1.CGET arrived in the disaster area 16 days after the disaster and stayed there for 10 days.There were 90 multinational rescue teams arrived in Philippines after the typhoon disaster.There were 26.51 members on the average in each one.The ratio between medical and non-medical staff was 2.12∶ 1.The ratio between doctors and nurses was 1.27∶1.The first team arrived 2 days later.The last team arrived 17 days later.The shortest stay time and the longest stay time were 2 and 150 days,respectively.The median stay time was 13 days.Conclusions The CGET has more medical personnel and less logistics personnel compared with other teams.Logistical support should be strengthened in the future rescue work.
关键词
台风/灾难/救援/救援队/人员构成/后勤保障/比较Key words
Typhoon/Disaster/Rescue/Rescue team/Personnel composition/Logistics support/Comparison引用本文复制引用
出版年
2015
NETL
NSTL
维普
万方数据