中华急诊医学杂志2024,Vol.33Issue(1) :59-64.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0282.2024.01.010

纳布啡用于重症加强治疗病房非机械通气患者的镇痛效果:多中心随机对照试验

Evaluation of analgesic effect of nalbuphine in patients with non-mechanical ventilation in intensive care unit:a multi-center randomized controlled trail

周一 刘韶华 覃松 张国秀 芦乙滨 段晓光 王海旭 张瑞芳 张曙光 罗永刚 方宇 傅小云 陈涛 任乐宁 孙同文
中华急诊医学杂志2024,Vol.33Issue(1) :59-64.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0282.2024.01.010

纳布啡用于重症加强治疗病房非机械通气患者的镇痛效果:多中心随机对照试验

Evaluation of analgesic effect of nalbuphine in patients with non-mechanical ventilation in intensive care unit:a multi-center randomized controlled trail

周一 1刘韶华 1覃松 2张国秀 3芦乙滨 4段晓光 1王海旭 1张瑞芳 1张曙光 1罗永刚 1方宇 1傅小云 2陈涛 2任乐宁 3孙同文1
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 郑州大学第一附属医院急诊医学部,郑州 450052
  • 2. 遵义医科大学附属医院重症医学科,遵义 563003
  • 3. 河南科技大学第一附属医院急诊医学部,洛阳 471003
  • 4. 信阳市中心医院重症医学科,信阳 464000
  • 折叠

摘要

目的 探讨纳布啡应用于重症加强治疗病房(intensive care unit,ICU)非机械通气患者镇痛的有效性和安全性.方法 本研究为多中心随机对照临床试验,选择2018年12月至2021年8月河南省和贵州省共4家医院ICU收治的、有镇痛需求的非机械通气患者为研究对象,按随机数字表法将患者分为纳布啡组与芬太尼组.纳布啡组给予持续静脉泵入纳布啡[0.05~0.20 mg/(kg·h)],芬太尼组给予持续静脉泵入芬太尼[0.5~2.0 μg/(kg·h)],镇痛目标为重症监护疼痛观察量表(critical-care pain observation tool,CPOT)评分<2分.观察时间为48 h,主要观察指标为CPOT评分,次要观察指标为Richmond躁动-镇静评分(Richmond agitation-sedation score,RASS)、ICU住院时间、不良事件发生率以及需要机械通气比例.两组计量资料比较采用t检验或Mann-Whitney U检验,计数资料比较采用x2检验或Fisher确切概率法.组间不同时间点的数据比较采用重复测量的方差分析.结果 最终纳入210例患者,纳布啡组和芬太尼组各105例.两组患者基线资料比较差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05).纳布啡组与芬太尼组用药后各时间点CPOT评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),两组用药后各时间点CPOT评分均较用药前明显降低,且用药后2 h均可达到镇痛目标并维持.两组用药后各时间点RASS评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),均较用药前明显降低,用药后2 h达到目标镇静效果.纳布啡组与芬太尼组患者ICU住院时间差异无统计学意义[5.0(4.0,7.5)d vs.5.0(4.0,8.0)d,P=0.504].纳布啡组患者谵妄、恶心呕吐、腹胀、瘙痒、眩晕等不良事件发生率低于芬太尼组(均P<0.05),其他不良反应如镇静过深、低血压、心动过缓等发生率与芬太尼组差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05).纳布啡组患者呼吸抑制发生率与芬太尼组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但需要机械通气比例明显低于芬太尼组[1.9%(2/105)vs.8.6%(9/105),P=0.030].结论 纳布啡可用于ICU非机械通气患者的镇痛,2h可达到目标镇痛效果,且具有一定镇静作用,不良反应发生率低.

Abstract

Objective To analyze the efficacy and safety of nalbuphine for analgesia in patients with non-mechanical ventilation in intensive care unit(ICU).Methods From December 2018 to August 2021,a multicenter randomized controlled clinical study was conducted to select non-mechanical ventilation patients with analgesic needs admitted to ICU of four hospitals in Henan Province and Guizhou Province.Patients were randomly assigned to nalbuphine group and fentanyl group.The nalbuphine group was given continuous infusion of nalbuphine[0.05~0.20 mg/(kg·h)],and the fentanyl group was given continuous infusion of fentanyl[0.5-2.0 pg/(kg·h)].The analgesic target was critical-care pain observation tool(CPOT)score<2.The observation time was 48 hours.The primary endpoint was CPOT score,the secondary endpoints were Richmond agitation-sedation score(RASS),ICU length of stay,adverse events,and proportion of mechanical ventilation.The quantitative data of the two groups were compared by t test or Mann-Whitney U test.The enumeration data were compared by chi square test or Fisher exact probability method.The data at different time points between groups were compared by repeated measures analysis of variance.Results A total of 210 patients were enrolled,including 105 patients in the nalbuphine group and 105 patients in the fentanyl group.There was no significant difference in baseline data between the two groups(all P>0.05).There was no significant difference in CPOT score between nalbuphine group and fentanyl group at each time point after medication(P>0.05),the CPOT score of both groups at each time point after medication was significantly lower than that before medication,and the analgesic target could be achieved and maintained 2 hours after medication.There was no significant difference in RASS between the two groups at each time point after medication(P>0.05),which was significantly lower than that before medication,and the target sedative effect was achieved 2 hours after medication.There was no significant difference in ICU length of stay between nalbuphine group and fentanyl group[5.0(4.0,7.5)d vs.5.0(4.0,8.0)d,P=0.504].The incidence of delirium,nausea and vomiting,abdominal distension,pruritus,vertigo and other adverse events in the nalbuphine group was lower than that in the fentanyl group(all P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the incidence of other adverse events such as deep sedation,hypotension and bradycardia between the two groups(all P>0.05).The incidence of respiratory depression in nalbuphine group was not significantly different from that in fentanyl group(P>0.05),but the proportion of mechanical ventilation was significantly lower than that in the fentanyl group[1.9%(2/105)vs.8.6%(9/105),P=0.030].Conclusions Nalbuphine could be used for analgesia in ICU patients with non-mechanical ventilation.The target analgesic effect could be achieved within 2 hours,and it had a certain sedative effect with a low incidence of adverse reactions.

关键词

纳布啡/芬太尼/镇痛/镇静/不良事件

Key words

Nalbuphine/Fentanyl/Analgesia/Sedation/Adverse event

引用本文复制引用

基金项目

中央引导地方科技发展基金(Z20221343037)

河南省医学科技攻关计划省部共建重大项目(SBGJ202101015)

出版年

2024
中华急诊医学杂志
中华医学会

中华急诊医学杂志

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.556
ISSN:1671-0282
参考文献量1
段落导航相关论文