首页|体外心肺复苏患者预后不良的危险因素

体外心肺复苏患者预后不良的危险因素

扫码查看
目的 分析体外心肺复苏(extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation,ECPR)患者的临床特征,探索导致患者预后不良的危险因素.方法 回顾性分析2020年1月至2023年5月收住本院接受ECPR的95例患者的临床资料.根据出院时的存活状态分为存活组和死亡组,比较两组临床资料的差异,探讨和死亡及预后不良相关的危险因素.通过二元Logistic回归分析确定与患者死亡相关的危险因素.结果 本研究共纳入95例ECPR患者,出院时死亡62例(65.3%),存活33例(34.7%),与存活组患者相比,死亡组患者低血流时间[40(30,52.5)min vs.30(24.5,40)min]和总停搏时间[40(30,52.5)min vs.30(24.5,40)min]更长、总住院时间[3(2,7.25)d vs.19(13.5,31)d]和体外膜肺氧合(extracorporeal membrane oxygenation,ECMO)辅助时间[26.5(17,50)vs.62(44,80.5),h]更短,院内心脏骤停(inhospital cardiac arrest,IHCA)占比人数更多(56.5%vs.33.3%),ECMO前有自主心律恢复者更少(37.1%vs.84.8%),初始乳酸值[(14.008±5.188)mmol/L vs.(11.23±4.718)mmol/L]、APACHE Ⅱ评分[(30.10±7.45)vs.(25.88±7.68)]和SOFA评分[12(10.75,16)vs.10(9.5,13)]更高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 ECMO前无自主心律恢复、初始高乳酸、高SOFA评分是ECPR患者预后不良的独立危险因素.
Risk factors for poor prognosis in patients with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation
Objective To analyze the clinical characteristics of patients undergoing extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation(ECPR),and to explore the risk factors leading to poor prognosis.Methods The clinical data of 95 patients with ECPR admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from January 2020 to May 2023 were retrospectively analyzed.According to the survival status at the time of discharge,the patients were divided into the survival group and death group.The difference of clinical data between the two groups was compared to explore the risk factors related to death and poor prognosis.Risk factors associated with death were identified by Binary Logistic regression analysis.Results A total of 95 patients with ECPR were included in this study,62(65.3%)died and 33(34.7%)survived at discharge.Patients in the death group had longer low blood flow time[40(30,52.5)min vs.30(24.5,40)min]and total cardiac arrest time[40(30,52.5)min vs.30(24.5,40)min],shorter total hospital stay[3(2,7.25)d vs.19(13.5,31)d]and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation(ECMO)assisted time[26.5(17,50)h vs.62(44,80.5)h],and more IHCA patients(56.5%vs.33.3%)and less had spontaneous rhythm recovery before ECMO(37.1%vs.84.8%).Initial lactate value[(14.008±5.188)mmol/L vs.(11.23±4.718)mmol/L],APACHE Ⅱ score[(30.10±7.45)vs.(25.88±7.68)]and SOFA score[12(10.75,16)vs.10(9.5,13)]were higher(P<0.05).Conclusions No spontaneous rhythm recovery before ECMO,high initial lactic acid and high SOFA score are independent risk factors for poor prognosis in ECPR patients.

Cardiac arrestCardiopulmonary resuscitationExtracorporeal membrane oxygenationExternal cardiopulmonary resuscitationLactateShockable rhythmSequential Organ Failure Assessment,SOFARisk factorIndependent risk factors

王君君、仝帅、雷如意、贾新雅、宋晓东、张唐娟、王宏、周岩、李仁杰、朱星强、杨褚君、兰超

展开 >

郑州大学第一附属医院急诊科,郑州 450000

郑州大学第一附属医院体外循环中心,郑州 450000

心脏骤停 心肺复苏 体外膜肺氧合 体外心肺复苏 乳酸 可除颤心律 序贯器官衰竭估计评分 危险因素 独立危险因素

河南省医学科技攻关计划省部共建重点项目河南省高等学校重点科研项目国家重点研发计划重点专项

SBGJ20210215522A3200672021YFC2501800

2024

中华急诊医学杂志
中华医学会

中华急诊医学杂志

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.556
ISSN:1671-0282
年,卷(期):2024.33(2)
  • 29