首页|早期VA-ECMO支持在急诊经皮冠脉介入治疗围手术期的应用价值

早期VA-ECMO支持在急诊经皮冠脉介入治疗围手术期的应用价值

扫码查看
目的 探讨急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克(acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock,AMICS)患者应用静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合(venous-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation,VA-ECMO)的不同时机对患者预后的影响.方法 本研究为前瞻性队列研究,纳入2017年5月至2022年10月就诊于于河南省人民医院接受VA-ECMO支持经皮冠脉介入治疗(primary percutaneous coronary intervention,PPCI)的 AMICS 患者 79 例,根据 VA-ECMO 应用时机,分为早期VA-ECMO组和晚期VA-ECMO组;另纳入同期符合VA-ECMO适应症但未接受VA-ECMO支持的AMICS患者64例为对照组,收集3组患者的人口学基线特征、冠状动脉介入手术资料、围手术期并发症等指标.主要终点事件为1年内生存,次要终点事件为院内及围手术期死亡.采用多因素Logistic及Cox回归模型评估AMICS患者院内及1年内死亡的独立预测因素;采用Kaplan-Meier生存曲线分析3组患者1年内的生存结局.结果 共纳入143例AMICS患者,最终136例患者资料纳入分析,其中早期VA-ECMO组42例,晚期VA-ECMO组34例,无VA-ECMO组60例.与晚期VA-ECMO组相比,早期VA-ECMO组患者VA-ECMO后PPCI的比例更高,入院门至导丝通过(door to balloon time,D-to-B)的时间更长、VA-ECMO的支持时间更短、撤机成功率更高,且并发症发生率较低(均P<0.05).与早期VA-ECMO组相比,无VA-ECMO支持组围术期、院内及1年病死率均明显升高(均P<0.05).早期VA-ECMO组与晚期VA-ECMO组围手术期及院内病死率差异虽无统计学意义,但晚期VA-ECMO组1年病死率明显较高(P<0.05);晚期VA-ECMO组和无VA-ECMO组相比,围手术期、院内及1年病死率虽降低,但差异均无统计学意义.多因素Logistic及Cox回归模型分析提示,校正干扰因素后,早期VA-ECMO仍是院内(OR=0.244,P=0.015)及 1 年(HfR=0.308,P=0.001)死亡的保护因素;Kaplan-Merier 生存曲线显示较晚期VA-ECMO及无VA-ECMO组,早期VA-ECMO组1年内生存率最高.结论 与晚期应用VA-ECMO支持PPCI相比,早期VA-ECMO可使AMICS患者获益更大.
The value of early VA-ECMO support in the perioperative period of emergency percutaneous coronary intervention
Objective To investigate the effect of different timing of arterial-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation(VA-ECMO)on the prognosis of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated with cardiogenic shock(AMICS).Methods This study was a prospective cohort study.AMICS patients received VA-ECMO support primary percutaneous coronary intervention in Henan Provincial People's Hospital from May 2017 to July 2023 were divided into early VA-ECMO group and late VA-ECMO group.64 AMICS patients who met the indications for VA-ECMO implantation,but did not revive VA-ECMO were included as control group.Demographic characteristics,coronary interventional(PCI)information and complications after VA-ECMO implantation were collected.The primary end points was 1-year survival,minor end point were in-hospital and perioperative death.Multivariate Logistic and Cox regression models were used to evaluate the effect of timing of VA-ECMO on prognosis of AMICS patients.Kaplan-Meier survival curve was used to analyze the 1-year survival outcome of the 3 groups.Results A total of 143 AMICS patients were included,and materials of 136 patients entered in the final analysis,including 42 in the early VA-ECMO group,34 in the late VA-ECMO group,and 60 in the non-VA-ECMO group.Compared with the late VA-ECMO group,the early VA-ECMO group had a higher ratio of PPCI after VA-ECMO,a longer D-to-B time,a shorter VA-ECMO support time,a higher success rate of VA-ECMO withdrawal,and a lower complication rate(all P<0.05).Compared with the early VA-ECMO group,the perioperative,in-hospital and 1-year mortality were significantly higher in Non-ECMO support(all P<0.05).There was no difference in perioperative and in-hospital mortality between the early VA-ECMO group and the late VA-ECMO group,but the 1-year mortality in the late VA-ECMO group was significantly higher(P<0.05).Perioperative,in-hospital and 1-year mortality rates were lower in the late VA-ECMO group than in the no-VA-ECMO group,but the differences were not statistically significant.Multivariate Logistic and Cox regression analysis showed that after adjusting interference factors,early VA-ECMO was still a protective factor for in-hospital(OR=0.244,P=0.015)and one year(HR=0.308,P=0.001)mortality.Kaplan-Merier survival curve showed that compared with the late VA-ECMO group and the group without VA-ECMO,the early VA-ECMO group had the highest 1-year survival rate.Conclusion Patients with AMICS may benefit more from early VA-ECMO than from late VA-ECMO support for PPCI.

Acute myocardial infarctionCardiogenic shockArterio-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenationPercutaneous coronary intervention

余海佳、李静超、宋慧慧、崔路乾、董淑娟、楚英杰、秦历杰

展开 >

河南省人民医院急诊科,郑州 450003

河南省人民医院CCU,郑州 450003

河南省人民医院心内科,郑州 450003

急性心肌梗死 心源性休克 静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合 经皮冠状动脉介入

2024

中华急诊医学杂志
中华医学会

中华急诊医学杂志

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.556
ISSN:1671-0282
年,卷(期):2024.33(7)