首页|丙泊酚对高血压合并超急性期非复杂型Stanford B型主动脉夹层患者血压和心率的作用

丙泊酚对高血压合并超急性期非复杂型Stanford B型主动脉夹层患者血压和心率的作用

扫码查看
目的 探讨丙泊酚对高血压合并超急性期非复杂型Stanford B型主动脉夹层(hyperacute uncomplicated type B aortic dissection,HU-TBAD)患者血压和心率(heart rate,HR)的作用.方法 本研究为单中心、双盲、随机对照试验,连续纳入2020年7月至2023年3月就诊于本院急诊科的HU-TBAD患者96例,以信封法随机均分为对照组和观察组,均予尼卡地平、瑞芬太尼、艾司洛尔和基础治疗.在此基础上,观察组予丙泊酚0.5mg/kg静脉注射后续以1.0 mg/(kg·h)持续微量泵静脉输注,每15 min评估RASS评分以调整丙泊酚用量,维持RASS评分目标值于-2~0分,对照组则予等体积生理盐水.比较两组各时点收缩压(systolic blood pressure,SBP)、舒张压(diastolic blood pressure,DBP)和 HR 的变化以及第 0(T0 min)和 60 min(T60 min)相关指标的变化;分析两组相关指标达标率和尿量、平均尼卡地平剂量、不良反应.干预结束后收住院继续予适当治疗并随访21 d.两组间数据比较采用独立样本t检验、Mann-WhitneyU检验、x2检验或Fisher's精确检验;两组不同时点的数据比较采用重复测量方差分析.结果 两组一般资料相比较差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05).两组各时点相比较,SBP、DBP和HR水平在不同时间、组间和组间与时间交互(组间×时间)差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05).两组T0 min和T60 min时点相比较,不同时间氧合指数水平差异有统计学意义(P<0.01),而组间和组间×时间差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05);二氧化碳分压、呼吸频率和乳酸水平在不同时间和组间×时间存在统计学意义(均P<0.01),而组间差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05);在不同时间、组间和组间×时间心肌肌钙蛋白I水平差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05),而NRS评分差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05).与对照组相比,观察组SBP、DBP、HR、镇痛和镇静达标率以及RASS评分差值均显著增高[54.17%vs.77.08%,56.25%vs.81.25%,50.00%vs.72.92%,47.92%vs.72.92%,43.75%vs.83.33%,1.00(0.00,2.00)分 vs.2.00(1.00,3.00)分,均P<0.05],平均尼卡地平剂量显著下降[µg·kg-1 min1,2.50(2.00,2.50)vs.2.00(1.50,2.50),P<0.01],尿量和不良反应发生率差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05).随访显示观察组出现夹层进展和入住ICU的比例较对照组均显著下降(19.57%vs.4.26%,23.91%vs.6.38%,均P<0.05).结论 丙泊酚增强瑞芬太尼的镇痛作用,协同降低高血压合并HU-TBAD患者的SBP、DBP和HR,改善预后.
Effects of propofol on blood pressure and heart rate in hypertensive patients with hyperacute uncomplicated type B aortic dissection
Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of propofol on blood pressure(BP)and heart rate(HR)in hypertensive patients with hyperacute uncomplicated type B aortic dissection(HU-TBAD).Methods This study was a single-center,double-blind,randomized controlled trial.Totally 96 consecutive hypertensive patients with HU-TBAD admitted to the Department of Emergency in our hospital from July 2020 to March 2023 were enrolled and randomly divided into control and treatment groups(n=48/group)by envelope method.All patients were treated with nicardipine,remifentanil,esmolol,and basic treatments.Besides,patients in the treatment group were injected with 0.5 mg/kg propofol,followed by 1.0 mg/(kg·h)with continuous micro-pump intravenous infusion;the RASS score was evaluated every 15 minutes to adjust the dosage of propofol to maintain the RASS score at-2-0 points,while the control group was given an equal volume of normal saline.Systolic blood pressure(SBP),diastolic blood pressure(DBP),and HR were analyzed at different time points(TPs).Related indexes between the two groups were compared at 0(T0 min)and 60(T60 min)minutes.Standard-reaching rate of related indexes,levels of mean nicardipine dose(mND)and urine volume,and adverse effect rates(AERs)were also compared between the two groups.All patients were admitted to the cardiovascular surgical ward to receive proper management and follow-up for 21 d after discharge from the Department of Emergency.Mann-Whitney U test,t-test,x2 test,or Fisher's test were used to compare the data between the two groups,while the data of two groups at different TPs were compared by using repetitive measurement deviation analysis.Results No significant differences were observed in general clinical data between the two groups(all P>0.05).There were significant differences in SBP,DBP,and HR levels in different TPs,groups,and interaction of Time and Group(Time×Group)(all P<0.05).For comparison of related indexes at T0 min and T60 min,there were statistical differences in oxygenation index levels at different TPs(P<0.01),but not in different groups and Time×Group(all P>0.05);significant differences in levels of partial pressure of carbon dioxide,respiratory rate,and lactate were observed in different TPs and TimexGroup(all P<0.01),but not observed in different groups(all P>0.05).There were significant differences in NRS score in different TPs,groups,and Time×Group(all P<0.05),while not in cardiac troponin Ⅰ levels in different TPs,groups,and Time×Group(all P>0.05).Compared with the control group,the standard-reaching rate of SBP,DBP,HR,sedation,and analgesia as well as the level of RASS score reduction in the treatment group were significantly increased[54.17%vs.77.08%,56.25%vs.81.25%,50.00%vs.72.92%,47.92%vs.72.92%,43.75%vs.83.33%,1.00(0,2.00)vs.2.00(1.00,3.00),respectively,all P<0.05],while the level of mND was significantly decreased[μg·kg-1·min-1,2.50(2.00,2.50)vs.2.00(1.50,2.50),P<0.01];there were no statistical differences in both urine volume levels and AERs between the two groups(all P>0.05).Following up for 21 d,the rate of aortic dissection deterioration and ICU admission was significantly lower in the treatment group than in the control group(19.57%vs.4.26%,23.91%vs.6.38%,respectively,all P<0.05).Conclusions Propofol enhances the analgesic effect of remifentanil,synergistically reduces SBP,DBP,and HR,and improves clinical prognosis in hypertensive patients with HU-TBAD.

PropofolAortic dissectionRemifentanilBlood pressureHeart rate

郑武洪、肖鹏、周海珺、何宗存、陈锋、柯俊

展开 >

福建医科大学省立临床医学院,福建省立医院,福州大学附属省立医院急诊内科,福州 350001

丙泊酚 主动脉夹层 瑞芬太尼 血压 心率

福建省自然科学基金面上项目福建省卫生健康重大科研专项福建医科大学启航基金

2023J0112052022ZD010082021QH1273

2024

中华急诊医学杂志
中华医学会

中华急诊医学杂志

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.556
ISSN:1671-0282
年,卷(期):2024.33(7)