锦州医科大学学报(社会科学版)2024,Vol.22Issue(5) :11-16,21.

安乐死的有限出罪研究

The Research on the Limited Decriminalization of Euthanasia

李淑娟 王岩
锦州医科大学学报(社会科学版)2024,Vol.22Issue(5) :11-16,21.

安乐死的有限出罪研究

The Research on the Limited Decriminalization of Euthanasia

李淑娟 1王岩1
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 郑州大学法学院,河南郑州 450001
  • 折叠

摘要

消极安乐死在实务中有被界定为故意杀人罪的风险,对此,可参考德国判例,引入自我决定权作为消极安乐死的权利基础,并借助被害人承诺进行出罪.原则上,实施积极安乐死的行为不阻却违法性,应以故意杀人罪论处,但在量刑时可借助期待可能性理论,根据具体案情进行有限宽宥.在特定情形下,可通过规范适用但书条款,对积极安乐死做出无罪宣告的决定.

Abstract

In practice,the conduct of passive euthanasia carries the risk of being characterized as intentional homicide,and in this regard,one could refer to German case law for introducing the right to self-determination as the legal basis for passive euthanasia,and utilize the concept of victim's consent to exculpate such actions.As a principle,the performance of active euthanasia does not negate its illegality and should be treated as intentional homicide.However,during sentencing,the theory of expectant possibility can be employed to grant limited leniency based on the specific circumstances of the case.Under certain defined conditions,it is possible to apply exceptions within proviso clause to render a decision of acquittal for cases involving active euthanasia.

关键词

安乐死/出罪/但书/期待可能性

Key words

euthanasia/decriminalization/proviso clause/expectant possibility

引用本文复制引用

出版年

2024
锦州医科大学学报(社会科学版)
辽宁医学院

锦州医科大学学报(社会科学版)

影响因子:0.324
ISSN:1674-0416
段落导航相关论文