AIGC可版权性识别与权属配置:以"浅层解释"为出发点
Identification of the Ability to Obtain Copyright and Ownership Configuration of AIGC:"Shallow explanation"as a starting point
王海蓓 1杨馨淏2
作者信息
- 1. 中国人民公安大学侦查学院
- 2. 都灵大学欧洲法律研究中心
- 折叠
摘要
近现代科学"浅层解释"的方法能够为理解生成式人工智能的现代性与局限性提供有益的理论视角,也能为正在各行业深入应用的人工智能生成内容所涉及的版权问题分析提供新颖的视角.目前来看,生成式人工智能只是浅层理解人类的沟通语言,就具体的技术原理而言,人工智能生成内容基于概率分布的方式、人类介入的行为而产生相应的内容表达.因此,从可版权性的角度上看,纯粹通过人工智能生成的内容并不是目前著作权法意义上的作品,但存在人类介入的内容仍旧能够通过版权进行保护.就可受版权保护的人工智能生成内容而言,从科技发展引起的人机关系"浅层革命"出发,可以有效明确相应的版权主体.目前,相应人工智能生成技术的发展没有从根本上动摇工具主义的适用基础.因此版权主体仍旧限于传统版权法意义上的自然人与法人范畴.就进一步的权属配置而言,需要对现有法律规定进行"浅层调适",即沿着人工智能生成内容相关方的利益关系,以人类中心主义作为权利归属的认定原则,但在模型作为服务、权利继受等情形中仍需要进行特别的权属方案构建.
Abstract
The"shallow explanation"approach of modern science can provide useful theoretical perspectives for understanding the modernity and limitations of generative AI,as well as novel analyses of the copyright issues involved in AIGC,which is currently being applied in a variety of industries.At present,generative AI is still only a shallow understanding of human communication language,in terms of specific technical principles,AIGC generates corresponding content expression based on probability distribution and human intervention behavior.Thus,from the perspective of the ability to obtain copyright,content generated purely through AI is not a work within the meaning of current copyright law,but content in which there is human intervention can still be protected through copyright.In the case of AIGC which can be protected by copyright,the"shallow revolution"in human-computer relations caused by the development of science and technology has made it possible to effectively define the corresponding copyright subjects.At present,the development of the corresponding artificial intelligence generation technology still has not fundamentally shaken the application basis of instrumentalism,so the copyright subject is still limited to the category of natural and legal persons in the sense of traditional copyright law.In terms of further ownership configuration,it is necessary to carry out"shallow adjustment"to the existing legal provisions,that is,to take anthropocentrism as the identification principle of rights ownership along the interest relationship of the relevant parties of AIGC,but it is still necessary to construct special ownership schemes in cases such as model as service and right inheritance.
关键词
AIGC/可版权性/权利归属/浅层解释/ChatGPTKey words
AIGC/ability to obtain copyright/rights ownership/shallow explanation/ChatGPT引用本文复制引用
出版年
2024
NETL
NSTL
万方数据