首页|超越"主权者"悖论——从《路易·波拿巴的雾月十八日》谈起

超越"主权者"悖论——从《路易·波拿巴的雾月十八日》谈起

扫码查看
如何化解"主权者"任意决断与行动受限间的二律背反,是西方近代政治思想史研究的理论脉络之一,也是贯穿马克思波拿巴主义批判的重要线索.施米特对"决断"的过度强调,招致了阿甘本的批判,但阿甘本的批判本身亦存在薄弱之处.若借鉴阿甘本将法哲学问题形而上学化的思路,将"主权者"悖论的论域移至批判哲学中,则可通过对"人民主权"观念的先验属性的强调,实质性推进对此问题的研究.而在历史唯物主义框架中对历史与社会主体行动可能性及界限展开的探讨,则可达成对"主权者"悖论的超越和对历史唯物主义的深入理解.
Transcend the Paradox of Sovereignty:Starting from The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte
How to resolve the sovereign's contradiction between the arbitrary decision and the restricted action is one of the theoretical threads in the study of contemporary western political thought history,and it is also an important clue that runs through the Marx's criticism of Bonapartism.Schmitt's excessive emphasis on"decision-making"has led to criticism from Agamben,but there are also weaknesses in Agamben's criticism itself.If we draw inspiration from Agamben's metaphysical approach to the problem of legal philosophy and shift the scope of the"sovereign"paradox to critical philosophy,we can sub-stantially advance research on this issue by emphasizing the prior attribute of the concept of"people's sovereignty".The exploration of the possibilities and boundaries of historical and social subject actions within the framework of historical materialism can achieve a transcendence of the"sovereign"paradox and a deeper understanding of historical materialism.

"sovereignty"legitimacyhistorical materialismThe Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonapar-teKarl Marx

张宗杰

展开 >

南开大学哲学院

"主权者" 合法性 历史唯物主义 《路易·波拿巴的雾月十八日》 马克思

天津市研究生科研创新项目

2020YJSB171

2024

科学·经济·社会
兰州大学

科学·经济·社会

CHSSCD
影响因子:0.229
ISSN:1006-2815
年,卷(期):2024.42(1)
  • 18