首页|论广义论证中语境对语言选择的制约性——从语用学的观点看

论广义论证中语境对语言选择的制约性——从语用学的观点看

扫码查看
从语用学的观点看,广义论证就是在现实的、具体的语境下,参与者不断做出语言选择的过程,说者选择语言表达意义,听者感知和推理对方想要表达的意义.参与者互动交际,交替作为说者和听者,各自处于论证的不同阶段,都要受到相关的语境因素的制约,各自的制约性有所不同,因而各自应对的原则也就不同.
On the Restraint of Context on Language Choice in Generalized Argumentation——From the Perspective of Pragmatics
From the perspective of pragmatics,generalized argumentation is the process in which partici-pants constantly make linguistic choices in a realistic and specific context.The speaker chooses some lin-guistic structures to express the meaning,and the listener perceives and deduces the meaning that the other party wants to express.Participants interact and communicate,alternately as speakers and listeners,each at different stages of the argumentation,are subject to the constraints of relevant contextual factors,and then,their constraints are different,so their principles of response are different.

generalized argumentationlinguistic choiceadaptationrelevance

屈凯

展开 >

中山大学逻辑与认知研究所

广义论证 语言选择 顺应 关联

2024

科学·经济·社会
兰州大学

科学·经济·社会

CHSSCD
影响因子:0.229
ISSN:1006-2815
年,卷(期):2024.42(3)
  • 5