科学养生2023,Vol.26Issue(3) :233-235.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-9714.2023.03.118

居民重点传染病防治知信行现状及健康教育干预调查分析

Investigation and analysis of the status quo of knowledge, practice and health education intervention in prevention and treatment of key infectious diseases among residents

陈虹
科学养生2023,Vol.26Issue(3) :233-235.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-9714.2023.03.118

居民重点传染病防治知信行现状及健康教育干预调查分析

Investigation and analysis of the status quo of knowledge, practice and health education intervention in prevention and treatment of key infectious diseases among residents

陈虹1
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 临沂市沂水县疾病预防控制中心,山东 临沂 276400
  • 折叠

摘要

目的 分析居民重点传染病防治知信行现状,制定健康教育干预措施并实施后探究效果.方法 纳入本社区600名居民,纳入时间为2020年3月~2022年3月,对调查问卷进行设计,分别在健康教育干预前后开展居民重点传染病防治知信行现状调查,详细分析结果.结果 在健康教育干预实施前,居民的重点传染病防治知识知晓率为29.08%,在干预后已达到62.85%,对比差异存在统计学意义(P < 0.05);其中,居民对肺结核国家减免政策、乙肝传播途径以及流感传播途径的知晓率相对较低,分别为10.50%、10.83%、16.17%;在干预前,居民饭前、便后每次都洗手占比相对较高,分别为75.50%、82.00%,居民其余卫生诊治行为在干预前后比较差异均具有统计学意义(P < 0.05).结论 在重点传染病防治方面上,为居民开展健康教育干预,可促进其总体知晓率的提升,使其形成良好的卫生与诊治行为.

Abstract

Objective To analyze the status quo of residents'' knowledge, belief and practice of prevention and treatment of key infectious diseases, formulate health education intervention measures and explore the effect after implementation. Methods 600 residents in this community were included from March 2020 to March 2022. Questionnaires were designed, and the status quo of knowledge, belief and practice of prevention and control of key infectious diseases were investigated before and after health education intervention, and the results were analyzed in detail. Results Before the implementation of health education intervention, the awareness rate of key infectious disease prevention knowledge was 29.08%, after the intervention reached 62.85%, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Among them, the residents'' awareness rate of national reduction and exemption policy of tuberculosis, hepatitis B transmission route and influenza transmission route was relatively low, which were 10.50%, 10.83% and 16.17% respectively. Before intervention, the proportion of washing hands before meals and after going to the toilet was relatively high, which were 75.50% and 82.00%, respectively. The difference of other hygienic diagnosis and treatment behaviors of residents before and after intervention was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion In the aspect of prevention and treatment of key infectious diseases, health education intervention for residents can promote the overall awareness rate, and make them form good hygiene and diagnosis and treatment behavior.

关键词

居民/重点传染病防治/知信行现状/健康教育干预

Key words

residents/prevention and treatment of key infectious diseases/know the status quo/health education intervention

引用本文复制引用

出版年

2023
科学养生
中国医院管理杂志社

科学养生

影响因子:0.019
ISSN:1672-9714
参考文献量8
段落导航相关论文