首页|竖脊肌和多裂肌不同体位MRI检查在腰椎间盘突出症中的研究

竖脊肌和多裂肌不同体位MRI检查在腰椎间盘突出症中的研究

Study on Examination of Erector Spinae and Multifidus in Different Positions in Lumbar Disc Herniation

扫码查看
目的 研究竖脊肌和多裂肌在仰卧及俯卧过屈位MRI检查中的变化与腰椎间盘突出症(LDH)的关系.方法 选取LDH患者21 例(突出组)和健康志愿者21 名(对照组),两组均行仰卧及俯卧过屈位L3~S1 节段椎间盘扫描,应用Image J软件分别测量竖脊肌(ES)、多裂肌(MF)在两个体位轴位T2 WI图像上的数据,测量参数如下:总横截面积(TCSA)、脂肪浸润比(FIR)、功能性横截面积(FCSA)、两侧横截面积不对称性(TCSAasy、FCSAasy)及计算两体位TCSA、FCSA及FIR差值(S-P).仰卧位及俯卧过屈位两组内参数比较采用配对样本t检验,两组间参数比较采用独立样本t检验或Mann-Whitney U检验.应用ROC曲线评估ES和MF变化对LDH的提示效能.P<0.05 为差异有统计学意义.结果 在对照组和突出组中,L3~S1 各节段ES和MF的TCSA、FCSA仰卧位均较俯卧位增大(P≤0.001);对照组L3/4节段ES、L3~5节段MF和突出组L3/4节段MF的FIR俯卧位均较仰卧位增大(P<0.05);L5/S1 节段对照组ES和突出组MF的TCSA、L3/4节段对照组MF的FCSA两侧不对称(P<0.05);两组TC-SAasy、FCSAasy、FIR其余节段参数在两体位间无明显差异(P>0.05).L3/4 节段俯卧位ES的TCSA、FCSA在两组间均不对称(P<0.05);L3~S1 节段突出组MF的S-PTCSA、L3~5 节段S-PFCSA值均较对照组减小(P<0.05),其余节段ES和MF参数组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).ROC曲线示MF(AUC =0.920)对 LDH的提示效能优于 ES(AUC =0.814),MF中S-PTCSA(AUC =0.925)提示效能最高,S-PFCSA(AUC =0.805)次之,MF其余参数及ES所有参数对LDH提示效能一般.结论 仰卧及俯卧过屈位MRI检查示ES和MF对维护腰椎正常生理曲度具有重要作用,ES退变与腰椎间盘突出没有明确相关性,MF退变是腰椎间盘突出的原因之一,对研究LDH的病因及发病机制具有重要意义.
Objective To study the relationship between the changes of erector spinae and multifidus in supine and prone flexion and lumbar disc herniation(LDH).Methods 21 patients with lumbar disc herniation(herniation group)and 21 healthy volunteers(control group)were selected from the 903 Hospital of the Chinese People's Liberation Army.Both groups underwent supine and prone flexion L3-S1 segment disc scanning.Image J software was used to measure the data of erector spinae(ES)and multifidus(MF)on axial T2 WI images in two positions.The measurement parameters were as follows:total cross-sectional area(TCSA),fat infiltration ratio(FIR),functional cross-sectional area(FCSA),asymmetry of cross-sectional area on both sides(TCSAasy,FCSAasy)and the difference between TCSA,FCSA and FIR(S-P)were calculat-ed.Paired sample t test was used to compare the parameters between supine position and prone flexion position.Independ-ent sample t test or Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the parameters between the two groups.ROC curve was used to evaluate the efficacy of ES and MF changes in LDH.P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.Results In the control group and the protrusion group,the TCSA and FCSA of ES and MF in each segment of L3-S1 in supine position were higher than those in prone position(P≤0.001).The FIR of L3/4 segment ES,L3-5 segment MF in the control group and L3/4 segment MF in the protrusion group increased in prone position compared with supine position(P<0.05).TCSA of L5/S1 segment control group ES and MF of protrusion group,FCSA of L3/4 segment control group MF were bilateral asymme-try(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the other segmental parameters of TCSAasy,FCSAasy and FIR between the two groups(P>0.05).TCSA and FCSA of ES at L3/4 segment in prone position were asymmetric between two groups(P<0.05).The S-PTCSA of MF and S-PFCSA of L3-5 segments in the L3-S1 segment herniation group were lower than those in the control group(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in ES and MF parameters between the other segments(P>0.05).ROC curve showed that MF(AUC =0.920)was superior to ES(AUC =0.814)for LDH,S-PTCSA(AUC =0.925)was the highest,S-PFCSA(AUC =0.805)was the second,and the other parameters of MF and parameters of ES were general for LDH.Conclusion MRI examination in supine and prone flexion position showed that the erector spinae and multifidus played an important role in maintaining the normal physiological curvature of lumbar spine.There was no correlation be-tween ES degeneration and LDH.Multifidus degeneration was one of causes of LDH,which was of great significance to stud-y the causes and pathogenesis of lumbar disc herniation.

Erector spinaeMultifidusCross-section areaMagnetic resonance imagingLumbar disc herniation

周敏、苏娜、闫春丽、刘琦、陆洪江、陈兴灿、胡红杰

展开 >

310020 杭州,浙江大学医学院附属邵逸夫医院放射科

310013 杭州,中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第903 医院放射诊断科

325000 温州医科大学附属第一医院

竖脊肌 多裂肌 横截面积 磁共振成像 腰椎间盘突出症

杭州市科技发展计划基金资助项目

20170533B100

2024

临床放射学杂志
黄石市医学科技情报所

临床放射学杂志

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:0.872
ISSN:1001-9324
年,卷(期):2024.43(3)
  • 16