首页|MSCT在胰腺实性假乳头状瘤和囊实性胰腺癌中的鉴别诊断价值

MSCT在胰腺实性假乳头状瘤和囊实性胰腺癌中的鉴别诊断价值

The Value of MSCT in Differentiating Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasm of Pancreas from Cystic-solid Pancreatic Carcinoma

扫码查看
目的 探索多层螺旋CT(MSCT)在胰腺实性假乳头状瘤(SPN)与囊实性胰腺癌(PC)鉴别诊断中的价值.方法 回顾性分析经病理诊断证实的32 例SPN和14 例囊实性PC患者的临床及影像学资料,分析比较两组患者年龄、性别、病灶长径、位置、形状、边界、质地、强化方式、"浮云征"、钙化、胰管扩张、胰腺萎缩、侵犯或转移情况的发生率,测量计算病灶CT平扫及增强扫描各期CT值和比值比采用多因素逻辑回归分析建立诊断模型.应用受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)评估诊断模型在SPN和囊实性PC鉴别诊断中的效能.结果 SPN组患者平均年龄为32 岁,囊实性PC组患者平均年龄为64 岁,两组患者年龄差异具有统计学意义(P<0.001);SPN组病灶平均长径大于囊实性PC组,差异具有统计学意义(5.41 cm vs.3.90 cm,P =0.017);SPN组"浮云征"的发生率高于囊实性PC组(84.4%vs.42.9%),差异具有统计学意义(P<0.001);囊实性PC较SPN发生侵犯或转移的概率更高(42.9%vs.6.25%),差异具有统计学意义(P =0.006).患者性别、病灶位置、边界、形状、质地、钙化、胰腺萎缩、胰管扩张、强化方式及各期CT值和增强CT比值比在两组中的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).多因素逻辑回归分析提示"浮云征"、"侵犯或转移"是鉴别SPN和囊实性PC有统计学价值的预测因素.联合上述指标建模后行ROC曲线分析,曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.853(95%CI:0.714~0.991),诊断的敏感度、特异度和准确率分别为78.6%、90.6%和86.9%.结论 SPN多见于年轻患者,且病灶多边界清晰,很少出现转移或侵犯,"浮云征"为其增强后的特异性征象;而囊实性PC多边界模糊,"浮云征"少见,发生转移或侵犯的概率较高;相较于SPN,囊实性PC的病灶往往更小.
Objective To explore the value of MSCT in the differentiation of solid pseudopapillary tumor(SPN)from cystic-solid pancreatic carcinoma(PC).Methods A total of 32 pathologically confirmed SPN and 14 pathologically con-firmed cystic-solid pancreatic carcinoma were included in this study.Clinical data and CT findings,including tumor size,lo-cation,shape,margin,component,tumor contrast enhancement,tumor enhancement ratio,"floating cloud sign",calcifica-tion,pancreatic duct dilatation,pancreatic atrophy and invasion or metastases,were retrospectively analyzed and compared.Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to establish the diagnostic model.The receiver operating characteristic curve(ROC)was used to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of the model in the differential diagnosis of SPN and cystic-solid PC.Results Patients with SPN usually occurred in young women as compared to PC(mean age,32 vs.64,P<0.001).The tumor size of SPN group was significantly larger than that of cystic-solid PC group(5.41 cm vs.3.90 cm,P =0.017).SPNs usually showed"floating cloud sign",low metastatic rates compared with PCs(84.4%vs.42.9%,6.25%vs.42.9%,P<0.05 for both).There were no significant differences in gender,tumor location,margin,shape,component,tumor contrast enhancement,tumor enhancement ratio,calcification,pancreatic atrophy,or pancreatic duct dilatation between the two groups(P>0.05).Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that"floating cloud sign"and invasion or me-tastases were independent predictors of SPN and cystic-solid PC.The areas under the curve,sensitivity,specificity and accu-racy of the combined model were 0.853(95%CI:0.714-0.991),78.6%,90.6%and 86.9%,respectively.Conclusion Patients in SPN group were younger than cystic-solid PC group.The tumor size of cystic-solid PC group was smaller than that of SPN group.SPN usually showed"floating cloud sign",well-defined margin and low metastatic rates as compared to cystic-solid PC.

Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of pancreasCystic solid pancreatic carcinomaDifferential diagnosisMSCT

吕晓静、曹营营、钱丽超、魏昪、孙亚琳、王中秋、任帅

展开 >

210029 南京中医药大学附属医院(江苏省中医院)放射科

210022 南京中医药大学附属南京中医院

胰腺实性假乳头状瘤 囊实性胰腺癌 鉴别诊断 多层螺旋CT

国家自然科学基金国家自然科学基金国家自然科学基金国家自然科学基金中国博士后科学基金面上项目江苏省科协青年科技人才托举工程项目南京市博士后科研项目江苏省中医院优秀青年博士培养专项南京中医药大学自然科学研究项目南京中医药大学自然科学研究项目江苏省中医院高峰人才项目国家中医临床研究基地开放课题

822021358217192582371919823720172023M741808JSTJ-2023-WJ0272023QB0112XZR2023036XZR2021050y2021rc03JD2023SZ16

2024

临床放射学杂志
黄石市医学科技情报所

临床放射学杂志

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:0.872
ISSN:1001-9324
年,卷(期):2024.43(4)
  • 19