首页|表观扩散系数和动态对比增强MRI的定量参数在宫颈癌病理分级中的价值

表观扩散系数和动态对比增强MRI的定量参数在宫颈癌病理分级中的价值

The Value of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and Quantitative Parameters of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI in Grading Cervical Carcinoma

扫码查看
目的 探讨表观扩散系数(ADC)和定量动态对比增强磁共振成像(qDCE-MRI)在预测宫颈癌病理分级中的价值.方法 回顾性分析中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院2017年7月至2021年12月95例经手术病理确诊为宫颈癌的初诊患者的影像资料,所有患者术前均行常规MRI、扩散加权成像(DWI)及qDCE-MRI检查.分析定量参数容积转运常数(Ktrans)、速率常数(Kep)、血管外细胞间隙容积分数(Ve)、血浆容积分数(Vp)和ADC在不同病理级别宫颈癌之间的差异性和相关性.分析各参数预测G1/2和G3宫颈癌的效能.结果 Ktrans和Kep均与肿瘤病理分级呈正相关(r=0.323,P=0.001;r=0.455,P<0.001).Ktrans和Kep在G3肿瘤和G1/2肿瘤之间的差异具有统计学意义(Z=-2.769,P=0.006;Z=-4.321,P<0.001).Ktrans预测G3和G1/2肿瘤的敏感度、特异度和准确率分别为60.8%,72.7%和66.3%.Kep预测G3和G1/2肿瘤的敏感度、特异度和准确率分别为82.4%,63.6%和73.7%.结论 Ktrans和Kep与宫颈癌病理分级呈正相关,并且均可用于鉴别G3和G1/2肿瘤.
Objective To investigate the value of apparent diffusion coefficient(ADC)and quantitative dynamic con-trast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging(qDCE-MRI)in grading cervical carcinoma.Methods Imaging data of 95 patients who were newly diagnosed with cervical carcinoma proved by surgical pathology were retrospectively analyzed in Sun Yat-Sen memorial hospital from July 2017 to December 2021.All patients underwent conventional MRI,diffusion weighted imaging and qDCE-MRI before surgery.The difference and correlation of Ktrans,Kep,Ve,Vp and ADC value among different histopathologic grades were analyzed.The efficacy of these parameters in predicting G1/2 and G3 cervical carcinoma were also analyzed.Results Ktrans and Kep correlated positively with tumor's histopathologic grade(r=0.323,P=0.001 and r=0.455,P<0.001).There were statistical differences for Ktrans and Kep between G3 and G1/2 tumors(Z=-2.769,P=0.006 and Z=-4.321,P<0.001).The sensitivity,specificity and accuracy of Ktrans in predicting G3 and G1/2 tumors were 60.8%,72.7%and 66.3%,respectively.The sensitivity,specificity and accuracy of Kep in predicting G3 and G1/2 tumors were 82.4%,63.6%and 73.7%,respectively.Conclusion Ktrans and Kep correlated positively with pathological grades of cervical carcinoma and both of them can be used to differentiate G3 tumors from G1/2 tumors.

Cervical carcinomaHistopathologic gradeMagnetic resonance imagingDynamic contrast enhance-mentDiffusion weighted imaging

白志强、张翔、邓刊、史洁

展开 >

510120 广州,中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院

510220 广州,飞利浦临床技术科研部

宫颈癌 病理分级 磁共振成像 动态对比增强 扩散加权成像

广东省自然科学基金-面上项目

2023A1515011305

2024

临床放射学杂志
黄石市医学科技情报所

临床放射学杂志

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:0.872
ISSN:1001-9324
年,卷(期):2024.43(7)