首页|多排螺旋CT在高心率冠状动脉血管成像的质量评估及可行性分析

多排螺旋CT在高心率冠状动脉血管成像的质量评估及可行性分析

Quality Evaluation of Multi-Row Spiral CT Coronary Angiography in High Heart Hate Patients and its Feasibility Analysis

扫码查看
目的 通过对图像质量的分析,探讨多排螺旋CT在高心率冠状动脉成像的可行性.方法 对205例行冠状动脉CT血管造影(CTA)的患者资料进行回顾性分析,采用回顾性心电门控结合螺距-心率自动匹配技术采集数据.按心率不同分为A、B两组,其中A组110例,心率<80次/分;B组95例,心率≥80次/分.在所选择的增强扫描原始图像及冠状动脉曲面重组(CPR)上评估两组患者的图像质量,测量右冠状动脉(RCA)、左冠状动脉主干(LM)、左前降支(LAD)和左回旋支(LCX)的CT值,计算主动脉根部的信噪比(SNR)和噪声水平.记录并进一步分析两组间螺距与图像质量及辐射剂量的关系.对两组的观察数据进行统计学分析和比较.结果 A组90%(99/110)重组期相位于66%~80%RR间期,B组75.78%(72/95)重组期相位于35%~49%RR间期,两组间具有显著性差异(P<0.05).A、B两组患者的RCA、LAD、LCX的图像质量等级例数及出现伪影的节段数均无显著性差异(P>0.05),A、B组图像的主动脉根部噪声水平分别是(21.99±4.05)HU和(22.25±3.25)HU,SNR分别是23.11±5.60和22.07±5.04,两组间数据比较均无显著性差异(P>0.05);两组各冠状动脉强化CT值均高于300 HU,A 组 RCA、LM、LAD、LCX 的 CT 值分别为(430.18±78.92)HU、(497.41±87.46)HU、(416.42±78.95)HU 和(391.16±87.74)HU,高于 B 组[依次为(384.57±81.08)HU、(386.33±74.63)HU、(375.27±84.12)HU 和(356.06±87.21)HU],差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).A组自动匹配螺距0.18,B组自动匹配螺距0.16,两组间螺距有差异;两组患者的CT容积剂量指数(CTDIvol)、剂量长度乘积(DLP)及有效辐射剂量(ED)差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 多排(256层)螺旋CT选择较小螺距结合收缩末期的重组期相在高心率冠状动脉成像具有良好的效果,图像质量均能满足诊断要求,说明其具有可行性和值得临床应用推广.
Objective To explore the feasibility of multi-row spiral CT coronary angiography in high heart rate patients through analyzing the imaging quality.Methods 205 cases of coronary artery CT angiography(CCTA)were retrospec-tively analyzed,and the data were collected by retrospective electrocardiogram gating combined with automatic pitch-heart rate matching.They were divided into two groups according to heart rate,group A 110 cases,heart rate and<80 bpm;Group B,95cases and heart rate ≥80 bpm.The imaging quality of selected enhanced original imaging and CPR in both groups and the CT values of right coronary artery(RCA),left main trunk(LM),left anterior descending branch(LAD)and left circum-flex(LCX)were measured,noise-signal ratio(SNR)and noise level in aortic root were counted.The relationship between pitch and imaging quality and radiation dose between the two groups was recorded and further analyzed.The observed data of both groups were statistically treated and compared.Results Reconstruct the phases were situated 66%-80%RR inter-val in 90%patients(99/1 10 cases)in A group as well as reconstruct the phases were situated 35%-49%RR interval in 75.78%patients(72/95 cases)in B group which had significant difference(P<0.05).The imaging quality grade and sec-tion number with artifacts in RCA,LAD,left anterior descending branch and LCX hadn't all significant difference between A and B group(P>0.05).In A and B group,noise level in aortic root were 21.99±4.05 and 22.25±3.25 respectively,noise-signal ratio were 23.11±5.60 and 22.07±5.04 respectively that hadn't all significant difference between A and B group(P>0.05).The CT values of All coronary arteries were over 300 HU in both groups.In A group,the CT values of right coronary artery,left main trunk,left anterior descending branch and left circumflex were respectively 430.18±78.92,497.41±87.46,416.42±78.95 and 391.16±87.74 which were higher than B group(384.57±81.18,386.33±74.63,375.27±84.12 and 356.06±87.21 in order)and there was significant difference between both group(P<0.05).The automatic pitch-heart rate matching technology was used in the two groups of image acquisition data.The auto-matic pitch-heart rate matching pitch of group A was 0.18,and the automatic pitch-heart rate matching pitch of group B was 0.16,and the pitch of the two groups was different.There was no significant difference in CTDIvol(mGy)、DLP(mGy/cm)and ED between both group(P>0.05).Conclusion Multi-row(256 layer)spiral CT selecting smaller pitch combined with end-systole reconstruction has better effect for coronary CT angiography in high heart rate patients and the imaging quality is able to meet demand of diagnosing,which indicates that our way is feasibility and is worth promoting in clinics.

Coronary CTAHigh heart ratePhases selectingReconstruction intervalImaging qualityComparing and analyzing

王伟平、郑晓林、王彬、吕铭亮

展开 >

523000 东莞康华医院放射科

冠状动脉CTA 高心率 期相选择 重组期相 图像质量 比较与分析

2024

临床放射学杂志
黄石市医学科技情报所

临床放射学杂志

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:0.872
ISSN:1001-9324
年,卷(期):2024.43(10)