首页|T1 mapping定量评估脊髓型颈椎病严重程度的应用价值研究

T1 mapping定量评估脊髓型颈椎病严重程度的应用价值研究

T1 Mapping for the Application Value in the Quantitative Evaluation of the Severity of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy

扫码查看
目的 探讨基于颈髓T1 mapping的初始T1值定量评估脊髓型颈椎病(CSM)严重程度的应用价值.方法 前瞻性纳入CSM患者133例(CSM组)和健康志愿者30名(对照组).根据改良日本骨科协会评分(mJOA)将CSM患者分为轻度组(mJOA≥12)和重度组(mJOA<12).对所有受试者进行颈椎轴位及矢状位T2WI、矢状位T1 mapping成像,测量对照组各颈椎间盘层面(C2~C7)和CSM患者狭窄位置、狭窄位置上方及下方椎间盘层面的T1值(三层面T1值分别计为:T1狭窄值、T1上值及T1下值).同时测量CSM患者椎管狭窄处前后径和横截面积.采用组内相关系数(ICC)评价不同观察者对对照组各层面T1值测量结果的一致性.单因素分析比较对照组各颈椎节段之间T1值,同时对比CSM患者三个层面T,值与对照组平均T,值并进行两两比较.单因素分析比较轻重度CSM患者临床资料、影像学特征及T1值的差异.将mJOA评分和CSM患者各测量值进行相关性分析.使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线判断各测量值及组合测量值对轻重度CSM患者的鉴别诊断价值.结果 轻度CSM组50例,重度CSM组83例.两位观察者测量对照组各层面T1值结果一致性良好(ICC>0.6),且各层面T1值之间无统计学差异(P>0.05).CSM 组 T1上值(t=-4.700,P<0.001)、T1狭窄值(Z=-6.186,P<0.001)、T1下值(Z=-4.212,P<0.001)分别与对照组平均T,值有统计学差异,且均高于对照组平均T1值.CSM组的T1狭窄值与T1上值、T1下值相比均有统计学差异(P<0.05),CSM组T,上值与T1下值分布无统计学差异(P>0.05).轻重两组患者的性别、mJOA、T2高信号[T2(+)]、T,上值、T1狭窄值、T1下值组间分布差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),mJOA评分与狭窄处前后径(r=0.227)、椎管横截面积(r=0.209)、T2(+)(r=-0.391)、T1狭窄值(r=-0.678)、T1上值(r=-0.549)、T,下值(r=-0.542)有相关性.狭窄处前后径、椎管横截面积、T2(+)、T1狭窄值、T1上值及T1下值鉴别轻重度CSM患者的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.575、0.557、0.645、0.857、0.711和0.733.T1狭窄值与以上其余参数联合鉴别轻重度CSM患者的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.857、0.860、0.860、0.859和0.859.结论 T1 mapping成像可定量评估CSM患者疾病的严重程度,为临床提供可靠的影像学参数.
Objective To investigate the applied value of quantitative assessment of the severity of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy(CSM)based on the native T1 value of cervical spinal cord T1 mapping.Methods Prospectively,133 patients with CSM(CSM group)and 30 healthy volunteers(control group)were enrolled.Patients with CSM were categorized into a mild group(mJOA ≥12)and a severe group(mJOA<12)according to the modified Japanese Orthopedic Association scores(mJOA).Axial and sagittal T2WI and sagittal T1 mapping imaging of the cervical spine were performed on all sub-jects,and T1 values were measured at each cervical disc level(C2-C7)in the control group and at the stenotic location,and at the disc level above and below the stenotic location in the patients with CSM(the T1 values at the three levels were counted as T1 stenosis,T1upand T1down).The anteroposterior diameter and cross-sectional area at the stenosis of CSM patients were also measured.The intragroup correlation coefficient(ICC)was used to evaluate the consistency of the measurement results of T,values at each level in the control group by different observers.Univariate analysis was used to compare T,val-ues between cervical segments in the control group,and T,values at the three levels in patients with CSM were also com-pared with the mean T,values in the control group and compared two by two.Univariate analysis was performed to compare the differences in clinical and imaging characteristics and T,values between patients with mild and severe CSM.The mJOA score and each measurement value of CSM patients were correlated.ROC curves were used to determine the differential di-agnostic value of each measurement and the combination of measurements in patients with mild and severe CSM.Results There were 50 cases in the mild CSM group and 83 cases in the severe CSM group.The results of the two observers measur-ing the T,values of the control group at each level were in good agreement(ICC>0.6),and there was no statistical differ-ence between the T1 values of each level(P>0.05).The T,up(t=-4.700,P<0.001),the T1 stenosis(Z=-6.186,P<0.001),and the T1 down(Z=-4.212,P<0.001)of the CSM group were statistically different from and higher than the mean T,values of the control group.The T1 stenosis values of the CSM group were statistically different from T1 and T1 down(P<0.05),and there was no statistically significant difference in the distribution of T1up,and T1down of the CSM group(P>0.05).The distribution of gender,mJOA,T2(+),T1 stenosis,T1,and T1down between the two groups of patients in the light and heavy groups differed(P<0.05).The mJOA scores were correlated with anterior and posterior diameters at the steno-sis[r=0.227],vertebral canal cross-sectional area[r=0.209],T2(+)[r=-0.391],T1stenosis[r=-0.678],T1up[r=-0.549],and T1down[r=-0.542]were correlated.The area under the ROC curve(AUC)for patients with anterior and posterior diameter,spinal cross-sectional area,T2(+),T1 stenosis,T1 up and T1 down were 0.575,0.557,0.645,0.857,0.711 and 0.733,respectively.The ROC area under the curve(AUC)of the above T,stenosis in combination with the parame-ters were 0.857,0.860,0.860,0.860,0.859 and 0.859,respectively.Conclusion T1 mapping imaging can quantitative-ly assess the severity of CSM patients and provide reliable imaging parameters for clinical use.

Magnetic resonance imagingCervical Spondylotic MyelopathyT1 mappingquantification

王晓云、彭艺飞、张丁予、田笑楠、张玉金、王勇、张力

展开 >

050000 石家庄,河北医科大学医学影像学院

050039 石家庄,河北医科大学第三医院CT室

050000 石家庄,河北医科大学第一医院放射与核医学科

磁共振成像 脊髓型颈椎病 T1 mapping 定量

2024

临床放射学杂志
黄石市医学科技情报所

临床放射学杂志

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:0.872
ISSN:1001-9324
年,卷(期):2024.43(12)