首页|Needle-perc超脉冲光纤铥激光碎石光纤周围温度变化的体外实验研究

Needle-perc超脉冲光纤铥激光碎石光纤周围温度变化的体外实验研究

扫码查看
目的:探究Needle-perc超脉冲光纤铥激光碎石过程中光纤周围温度变化的情况.方法:利用体外肾结石模型,由同一名医生行Needle-perc激光碎石术,采用2个测温探头置于激光光纤两侧2 mm处,实时进行检测并记录.保持实验室温度25 ℃左右.灌流液采用生理盐水,温度22℃左右.灌流速度:0、25、50、100 mL/min.碎石功率:8、10、12、15 W,参数组合:"高能低频"模式和"高频低能"模式.间断激发:激发15 s,间断5 s,每组实验周期为120 s;连续激发:连续激发120 s,每组实验重复10次,温度记录仪实时记录温度.结果:碎石功率为8、10、12、15 W时,灌流速度为0 mL/min时,温度超过安全阈值的时间分别是连续激发模式:23、18、13、9 s,间断激发模式:30、24、13、9 s.灌流速度为25、50、100 mL/min时,无论哪种激发模式,温度都没超过安全阈值.碎石功率为8、10、12、15 W,灌流速度25 mL/min时,"高能低频"碎块化模式和"高频低能"粉末化模式光纤周围温度变化值相比较,"高频低能"温度变化值高于"高能低频"模式,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).碎石功率为8、10、12、15 W,灌流速度25 mL/min时,连续激发和间断激发模式光纤周围温度变化值相比较,连续激发模式温度变化值温度高于间断激发,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论:Needle-perc超脉冲光纤铥激光进行碎石时,连续激发模式温度变化值高于间断激发,"高频低能"参数组合温度变化值高于"高能低频"参数组合.但在碎石功率在≤15 W,灌注速度在≥25 mL/min时,无论哪种激发模式、参数组合,激光光纤周围的温度都是安全、可靠的.
In vitro experimental study on the temperature variation around super-pulse fiber of thulium fiber laser lithotripsy with Needle-perc
Objective:To investigate the temperature changes around the fiber during the Needle-perc ultra-pulse fiber thulium laser lithotripsy.Methods:Using an in vitro kidney stone model,a single doctor performed Needle-perc laser lithotripsy,and two temperature probes were placed 2 mm on both sides of the laser fiber for re-al-time detection and recording.The laboratory temperature was maintained at around 25 ℃.The irrigation fluid was normal saline at a temperature of around 22 ℃.Irrigation flow rates were 0,25,50,and 100 mL/min.Lith-otripsy power was set at 8,10,12,and 15 W,and parameter combinations were"high energy low frequency"mode and"high frequency low energy"mode.The excitation mode was intermittent excitation:excitation for 15 s,intermittent for 5 s,and the experimental period for each group was 120 s;continuous excitation:continu-ous excitation for 120 s.Each group of experiments was repeated 10 times,and the temperature recorder recorded the temperature in real time.Results:If the lithotripsy power was 8,10,12,and 15 W and the irrigation flow rate was 0 mL/min,the time for the temperature to exceed the safety threshold in the continuous excitation mode was 23,18,13,and 9 s,respectively,and in the intermittent excitation mode,it was 30,24,13,and 9 s,re-spectively.If the irrigation flow rate was 25,50,and 100 mL/min,no matter which excitation mode was used,the temperature did not exceed the safety threshold.If the lithotripsy power was 8,10,12,and 15 W and the irri-gation flow rate was 25 mL/min,the temperature change value in the"high frequency low energy"mode was higher than that in the"high energy low frequency"mode.The difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).If the lithotripsy power was 8,10,12,and 15 W and the irrigation flow rate was 25 mL/min,the temperature change value in the continuous excitation mode was higher than that in the intermittent excitation mode.The difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:During the Needle-perc super-pulse fiber thulium la-ser lithotripsy,the temperature change value in the continuous excitation mode is higher than that in the intermit-tent excitation mode,and the temperature change value in the"high frequency low energy"parameter combination is higher than that in the"high energy low frequency"parameter combination.However,if the lithotripsy power is ≤15 W and the irrigation flow rate is ≥25 mL/min,no matter which excitation mode or parameter combination is used,the temperature around the laser fiber is safe and reliable.

kidney stonesNeedle-perctemperaturesuper-pulse thulium laser

丁天福、徐铮、肖博、黄忠月、单中杰、张楠、李建兴

展开 >

北京清华长庚医院泌尿外科 清华大学临床医学院泌尿疾病研究中心(北京,102218)

郑州人民医院泌尿外科

肾结石 Needle-perc 温度 超脉冲铥激光

2024

临床泌尿外科杂志
华中科技大学同济医学院附属协和医院 同济医院

临床泌尿外科杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.734
ISSN:1001-1420
年,卷(期):2024.39(9)