首页|机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术后辅助治疗对高危患者预后影响:一项中国真实世界研究

机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术后辅助治疗对高危患者预后影响:一项中国真实世界研究

扫码查看
目的:分析中国机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术(robot-assisted radical cystectomy,RARC)术后高危患者,即术后病理pT3~pT4和(或)pN+或者ypT2~ypT4和(或)ypN+接受辅助治疗现状,研究辅助治疗对其预后影响.方法:收集2012年3月—2021年8月国内32家医院4 395例RARC术后患者,筛选出高危患者,分析其接受辅助治疗与否、辅助治疗方案选择及总体生存(overall survival,OS)情况,研究辅助治疗对OS的影响.结果:4 395例RARC术后患者中30.3%(1 333/4 395)病理为pT3~pT4和(或)pN+或者ypT2~ypT4和(或)ypN+,即为高危患者,而这些高危患者中仅35.6%(475/1 333)接受辅助治疗,所接受的辅助治疗方案分别为吉西他滨+顺铂(GC)化疗(276/475,58.1%)、单纯免疫治疗(45/475,9.5%)、GC化疗联合免疫治疗(41/475,8.6%)及其他辅助治疗,包括非铂类化疗、放疗、靶向治疗等(113/475,23.8%).GC化疗组与未辅助治疗组OS结果差异有统计学意义(P=0.013);亚组分析中,在N分期N1~N3等亚组患者中,GC化疗组与未辅助治疗组OS结果差异有统计学意义(P=0.004).其他辅助治疗方案组与未辅助治疗组OS结果均差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论:国内RARC术后高危患者占比高,高危患者接受辅助治疗比例低.近10年国内辅助治疗方案主要为GC化疗.高危患者RARC术后接受GC化疗有生存获益,在N分期为N+等亚组人群中尤为明显.高危患者能否从单纯免疫治疗、GC化疗联合免疫治疗或其他辅助治疗中获益有待进一步研究.
Adjuvant therapy following robot-assisted radical cystectomy for high-risk patients:a real-world study in China
Objective:To investigate and study the application and benefits of adjuvant therapies in Chinese high-risk patients with pT3-pT4 Nany,Tany pN1-3,ypT2-ypT4 Nany or Tany ypN1-3 after robot-assisted radical cystectomy(RARC).Methods:A total of 4 395 patients after RARC at 32 hospitals in China from March 2012 to August 2021 were collected.Then we screened out the high-risk patients and investigated whether they re-ceived adjuvant therapies,what kind of regimen they received and the outcomes of overall survival(OS).At last,we studied the effects of adjuvant therapies on OS.Results:Among the 4 395 post-RARC patients,about 1/3(1 333/4 395)of them were at high risk with pT3-pT4 Nany,Tany pN1-3,ypT2-ypT4 Nany or Tany ypN1-3.Only about 1/3(475/1 333)high-risk patients received adjuvant therapies.The adjuvant therapy regiments were GC(276/475,58.1%),immunotherapy alone(45/475,9.5%),GC combined with immunotherapy(41/475,8.6%)and other adjuvant therapies including non-platinum chemotherapy,radiotherapy and targeted therapy(113/475,23.8%).The difference in OS between the group treated by GC and the group without adjuvant therapies was sta-tistically significant(P=0.013).In the subgroup analysis,there was significant difference in the result of OS be-tween the group treated by GC and the group without adjuvant therapies in N1-3 at N stage and other subgroups(P=0.004).There was no statistically significant difference between the group treated by other regimens and the group without adjuvant therapies(P>0.05).Conclusion:In China,the proportion of high-risk patients is high,while the proportion of these high-risk patients receiving adjuvant therapies is low.In recent 10 years,GC regimen is used commonly in China.Those high-risk patients who received GC chemotherapy following RARC have surviv-al benefits,especially in the subgroups such as N1-3 at N stage.Whether those high-risk patients benefit from immunotherapy,GC combined with immunotherapy or other adjuvant treatments needs to be further studied.

muscle-invasive bladder cancerrobot-assisted radical cystectomyhigh-riskadjuvant therapyoverall survivalprognosis

李锴文、李华润、黄健、何旺、林天歆

展开 >

中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院泌尿外科(广州,510120)

中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院深汕中心医院泌尿外科

肌层浸润性膀胱癌 机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术 高危 辅助治疗 总体生存 预后

2024

临床泌尿外科杂志
华中科技大学同济医学院附属协和医院 同济医院

临床泌尿外科杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.734
ISSN:1001-1420
年,卷(期):2024.39(12)