癫痫与神经电生理学杂志2024,Vol.33Issue(6) :336-344.DOI:10.19984/j.cnki.1674-8972.2024.06.03

拉考沙胺、吡仑帕奈及布立西坦添加治疗难治性癫痫部分性发作的网状Meta分析及药物经济学评价

Network meta analysis of lacosamide,perampanel and brivaracetam as add-on treat-ments in partial seizures of refractory epilepsy and pharmacoeconomic evaluation

姚巧 吕振 陈玉婷 胡咏梅 冯占辉 黄华
癫痫与神经电生理学杂志2024,Vol.33Issue(6) :336-344.DOI:10.19984/j.cnki.1674-8972.2024.06.03

拉考沙胺、吡仑帕奈及布立西坦添加治疗难治性癫痫部分性发作的网状Meta分析及药物经济学评价

Network meta analysis of lacosamide,perampanel and brivaracetam as add-on treat-ments in partial seizures of refractory epilepsy and pharmacoeconomic evaluation

姚巧 1吕振 2陈玉婷 2胡咏梅 2冯占辉 3黄华2
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 610075,四川成都,成都中医药大学医学与生命科学学院
  • 2. 达州市中心医院神经内科
  • 3. 贵州医科大学附属医院神经内科
  • 折叠

摘要

目的 系统评价拉考沙胺、吡仑帕奈、布立西坦添加治疗难治性癫痫部分性发作的有效性、耐受性和经济性.方法 通过检索知网、万方、维普、PubMed、Embase及Cochrane Library等数据库,收集随机对照试验(RCTs),检索时限从数据库建立至2024年6月,根据纳入和排除标准对文献资料进行筛选、提取和质量评价,采用Stata 15.0软件对药物的疗效和耐受性进行网状Meta分析,并基于分析结果采用最小成本分析法评价3种抗癫痫药物(ASM)的经济性.结果 共纳入12篇文献,总计5 369例患者.网状Meta分析结果显示,3种ASM的有效性和耐受性两两比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),但综合疗效和耐受性的聚类分析结果示布立西坦排名最优.药物经济学分析表明,无论与进口原研药还是国产仿制药相比,吡仑帕奈均是目前经济性最佳的选择.结论 拉考沙胺、吡仑帕奈和布立西坦作为难治性癫痫部分性发作的添加治疗,三者的疗效和耐受性相互比较无明显差异,但吡仑帕奈更具有性价比优势;若最新上市的布立西坦未来能够进入集采并纳入国家医保,其可能作为添加治疗的更优抉择.

Abstract

Objective To systematically evaluate the efficacy,tolerability,and cost-effectiveness of Lacosamide,Perampanel and Brivaracetam as add-on treatments in partial seizures of refractory epilepsy.Methods Randomized controlled trials(RCTs)published from the inception of each database to June 2024 were collected from CNKI,Wanfang,VIP,PubMed,Embase and Cochrane Library databases.Literature data were screened,extracted and assessed for quality based on inclusion and exclusion criteria.Drug efficacy and tolerability were analyzed using Network Meta Analysis with Stata 15.0 software.Based on the analysis results,cost-minimization analysis was applied to evaluate the economics of three anti-seizure medicines(ASMs).Results A total of 12 literatures involving 5369 patients were included.The results of Network Meta Analysis revealed that there were no statistically significant differences in the efficacy and tolerability of the three above ASMs when they were pairwisely compared(P>0.05).However,clustering analysis of comprehensive efficacy and tolerability showed that brivaracetam ranked the best.Pharmacoeconomic analysis showed that Perampanel was currently the most economical choice when compared to imported original drugs or domestically produced generic drugs.Conclusion Lacosamide,Perampanel and Brivaracetam as add-on treatments in partial seizures of refractory epilepsy demonstrated no significant differences in efficacy and tol-erability when they were compared to each another.If the latest marketed brivaracetam is included in central-ized procurement and national medical insurance in the future,it may be a better choice as an add-on treat-ment.

关键词

拉考沙胺/吡仑帕奈/布立西坦/难治性癫痫/部分性发作/有效性/耐受性/药物经济学/网状Meta分析

Key words

lacosamide/perampanel/brivaracetam/refractory epilepsy/partial seizures/effi-cacy/tolerability/pharmacoeconomics/network meta-analysis

引用本文复制引用

出版年

2024
癫痫与神经电生理学杂志
贵阳医学院,中华医学会神经病学分会脑电图与癫癎学组

癫痫与神经电生理学杂志

影响因子:0.276
ISSN:1674-8972
段落导航相关论文