首页|腹股沟直疝腹腔镜下经腹腹膜前疝修补术术中三种不同假疝囊处理方法的效果比较

腹股沟直疝腹腔镜下经腹腹膜前疝修补术术中三种不同假疝囊处理方法的效果比较

扫码查看
目的 探讨腹股沟直疝病人在腹腔镜下经腹腹膜前疝修补术(TAPP)术中分别采取旷置、单纯连续缝合法与环形缝合悬吊法处理假疝囊的手术效果.方法 2020年5月~2022年5月我院收治的腹股沟直疝病人120例,均行TAPP术治疗,按疝囊缺损部位处理方法分为三组:A组40例,采用假疝囊旷置术;B组40例,采用单纯连续缝合处理假疝囊;C组40例,采用环形缝合悬吊法处理假疝囊.对三组病人围手术期指标(手术时间、术中出血量、术后住院时间、住院费用)及术后效果(慢性疼痛、血清肿发生情况、切口或补片感染、异物牵拉感)进行比较.结果 120例病人均顺利完成TAPP手术,三组术中出血量、术后住院时间、伤口或补片感染与慢性疼痛比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);B、C两组的手术时间长于A组,血清肿发生率低于A组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);A组、C组异物牵拉感发生率低于B组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);B组、C组住院费用低于A组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 腹股沟直疝TAPP术中采取单纯连续缝合法与环形缝合悬吊法处理假疝囊均有改善病情的效果,但在经济性、术后效果等方面,环形缝合悬吊法更能使病人获益.
To compare the effects of false hernia sac exclusion,barbed suture and circular suture in transperitoneal preperitoneal laparoscopic hernia repair for direct hernia
Objective To investigate the difference of surgical effect of exclusion,simple continuous suture and circular suture suspension in TAPP for the treatment of false hernia sac in patients with direct inguinal hernia.Method From May 2020 to May 2022,120 patients diagnosed with direct inguinal hernia and treated with TAPP in our hospital were retrospectively.The false hernia sacs were divided into three groups according to different methods of treatment patients treated with false hernia sac exclusion were included in group A,those treated with simple continuous suture were included in group B,and those treated with circular suture suspension were included in group C.There were 40 patients in each group.The perioperative indicators(operation time,intraoperative blood loss,postoperative hospital stay,hospitalization cost)and postoperative effects(chronic pain,seroma,incision or mesh infection,foreign body traction feeling)were compared among the three groups.Results All 120 patients successfully completed TAPP surgery.There was no significant difference in general condition,intraoperative blood loss,postoperative hospital stay,wound or mesh infection and chronic pain among the three groups(P>0.05).The operation time of group B and C was longer than that of group A,and the incidence of seroma was significantly lower than that of group A,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The incidence of foreign body traction in group A and group C was lower than that in group B,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The hospitalization cost of group B and group C was lower than that of group A,with statistically significant difference(P<0.05).Conclusion In clinical practice,direct hernia and false hernia sac often need to be treated.In direct hernia TAPP operation,simple continuous suture method and circular suture suspension method have the effect of improving the condition of the false hernia sac,but in terms of economy and postoperative effect,the circular suture suspension method can benefit patients more.

false hernia sacdirect inguinal herniatransperitoneal preperitoneal laparoscopic hernia repairchronic painseroma

郑三侠、陈佳锦、董明明、李新明

展开 >

430081 武汉科技大学医学院

湖北省黄石市中心医院胃肠肛肠外科

假疝囊 腹股沟直疝 经腹腔腹膜前腹腔镜疝修补术 慢性疼痛 血清肿

湖北省卫生健康科研基金资助项目

WJ2019H175

2024

临床外科杂志
中华医学会湖北分会

临床外科杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.716
ISSN:1005-6483
年,卷(期):2024.32(1)
  • 22