首页|原发性高血压血流动力学分型的临床研究

原发性高血压血流动力学分型的临床研究

扫码查看
目的 研究原发性高血压血流动力学分型对治疗的指导作用,探讨原发性高血压血流动力学分型的临床价值.方法 本研究选取2013年10月至2015年10月在我院治疗的原发性高血压患者,年龄40-65岁的400例,随机数字法将患者分为研究组和对照组各200例,同时抽取我院健康查体同年龄段健康人群200例作为正常组用于确定正常值范围.对照组按照指南和临床经验用药,研究组根据心输出量和总外周阻力将患者分为Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ、Ⅳ四型分别为高排正阻、低排高阻、正排高阻和高排高阻.观察研究组各型的构成比及两组治疗前后的血液变化和血压达标率.结果 高血压患者的血流动力学分型为正排高阻>高排正阻>低排高阻>高排高阻.治疗后研究组收缩压和舒张压水平均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01).研究组血压达标患者147例,占73.5%,对照组血压达标患者103例,占51.5%,两组比较,差异有统计学意义(x2-20.651,P=0.000).结论 按照血流动力学指标对高血压患者进行分型并指导临床用药,可提高治疗效果,有临床推广价值.
Clinical study on hemodynamic type of essential hypertension
Objective To study the guiding role of hemodynamic classification in the treatment of primary hypertension and explore the clinical value of hemodynamic classification in primary hypertension.Methods This study selected 400 patients with primary hypertension who were treated in our hospital from October 2013 to October 2015,aged 40~65 years old,for the study.The patients were randomly divided into a study group and a control group,with 200 cases in each group.At the same time,200 healthy individuals of the same age group in our hospital were selected as the normal group for determining the normal value range.The control group received medication according to guidelines and clinical experience,while the study group divided patients into four types based on cardiac output and total peripheral force:type Ⅰ,type Ⅱ,type Ⅲ,and type Ⅳ:high output positive resistance,low output high resistance,positive output high resistance,and high output high resistance.Observe the composition ratio of each type in the research group,as well as the blood changes and blood pressure compliance rate before and after treatment in both groups.Results The hemodynamic classification of hypertensive patients is positive stroke resistance>high stroke resistance>low stroke resistance>high stroke resistance.After treatment,the average systolic and diastolic blood pressure in the study group was lower than that in the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.01).There were 147 patients with standard blood pressure in the research group,accounting for 73.5%,and 103 patients with standard blood pressure in the control group,accounting for 51.5%.The difference between the two groups was statistically significant(x 2=20.651,P=0.000).Conclusions Typing hypertensive patients based on hemodynamic indicators and guiding clinical medication can improve treatment effectiveness and have clinical promotion value.

Essential hemodynamicHemodynamics somatotypeClinical value

贾凤英、李艳霞、李丽

展开 >

伊犁哈萨克自治州奎屯医院(833200)

原发性高血压 血流动力学分型 临床价值

2024

临床心电学杂志
中华医学会安徽分会,中华医学会心电生理和起搏分会,北京大学人民医院

临床心电学杂志

影响因子:0.651
ISSN:1005-0272
年,卷(期):2024.33(1)
  • 10