临床消化病杂志2024,Vol.36Issue(2) :109-113.DOI:10.3870/lcxh.j.issn.1005-541X.2024.02.08

轻中度痔疮的内镜下套扎术与常规外科手术疗效的对照研究

A parallel comparison between endoscopic negative pressure ligature and conventional surgery on the treatment of mild to moderate hemorrhoids

杨亮 张培军 韩静 张金卓 谢长访 杨义超 熊英
临床消化病杂志2024,Vol.36Issue(2) :109-113.DOI:10.3870/lcxh.j.issn.1005-541X.2024.02.08

轻中度痔疮的内镜下套扎术与常规外科手术疗效的对照研究

A parallel comparison between endoscopic negative pressure ligature and conventional surgery on the treatment of mild to moderate hemorrhoids

杨亮 1张培军 1韩静 2张金卓 2谢长访 3杨义超 2熊英4
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 保定市第一中心医院普外三科,河北保定 071000
  • 2. 保定市第一中心医院消化内三科,河北保定 071000
  • 3. 保定市第一中心医院内窥镜中心,河北保定 071000
  • 4. 保定市第一中心医院消化内三科,河北保定 071000;保定市第一中心医院内窥镜中心,河北保定 071000
  • 折叠

摘要

[目的]探讨内镜下套扎术与常规外科手术治疗轻中度痔疮的临床疗效.[方法]选取入院就诊的轻中度痔疮患者106例,根据随机数表法分为内镜组(53例)和常规手术组(53例),常规手术组患者使用常规手术治疗,内镜组使用内镜下套扎术治疗,回顾性研究比较2组临床疗效,并对2组术中相关指标、术后疼痛评分和水肿评分进行比较,观察2组患者并发症发生情况.[结果]内镜组治疗有效率(94.34%)明显高于常规手术组(77.36%),差异有统计学意义(x2=6.704,P=0.035).内镜组手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间、恢复时间和住院费用均明显少于常规手术组,差异有统计学意义(t=13.603、7.676、38.297、19.922、5.609,P=0.000).内镜组术后疼痛评分和水肿评分均明显低于常规手术组,差异有统计学意义(t=24.962、49.216,P=0.000).内镜组患者不良反应发生率(13.21%)明显低于常规手术组(41.51%),差异有统计学意义(x2=10.681,P=0.001).[结论]相对于常规手术,内镜下套扎术治疗轻中度痔疮的临床疗效显著,可减少术中出血量和住院时间,减轻患者疼痛,且并发症较少,具有较高安全性,值得临床进一步推广.

Abstract

[Objective]Investigate the clinical efficacy of endoscopic negative pressure ligature and con-ventional operation on the treatment of mild and moderate hemorrhoids.[Methods]Total 106 cases of pa-tients with mild-to-moderate hemorrhoids,according to the stochastic indicator method,were divided into endoscopic group(53 cases)and normal group(53 cases).Patients in control group were treated with con-ventional surgery,patients in endoscopy group were treated with endoscopic ligation.The clinical curative effect,the related parameters of intraoperative and postoperative pain score,edema scores,and complica-tions in the two groups were compared.[Results]The effective rate in the endoscopic group(94.34%)was significantly higher than that in the conventional group(77.36%),and the difference was statistically sig-nificant(x2=6.704,P=0.035).The operative time,intraoperative blood loss,hospitalization time,recovery time and hospitalization cost in the endoscopic group were significantly less than those in the conventional group,with statistically significant differences(t=13.603,7.676,38.297,19.922,5.609,P=0.000).Post-operative pain and edema scores in the endoscopic group were significantly lower than those in the conven-tional group,with statistically significant differences(t=24.962,49.216,P=0.000).The incidence of ad-verse reactions in the endoscopic group(13.21%)was significantly lower than that in the conventional group(41.51%),and the difference was statistically significant(x2=10.681,P=0.001).[Conclusion]Com-pared with conventional surgery,endoscopic negative pressure ligation has a significant clinical efficacy in the treatment of mild and moderate hemorrhoids,which can reduce intraoperative blood loss and length of stay,relieve patients'pain,and has fewer complications.It is safe and worthy of further clinical promotion.

关键词

/内镜下套扎术/常规手术/临床疗效

Key words

hemorrhoids/endoscopic negative pressure ligation/routine surgery/clinical curative effect

引用本文复制引用

出版年

2024
临床消化病杂志
华中科技大学同济医学院协和医院,中国协和医科大学协和医院

临床消化病杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.085
ISSN:1005-541X
参考文献量21
段落导航相关论文