首页|减孔腹腔镜与常规多孔腹腔镜胃癌D2根治术的效果比较

减孔腹腔镜与常规多孔腹腔镜胃癌D2根治术的效果比较

扫码查看
目的 比较减孔腹腔镜与常规多孔腹腔镜胃癌D2根治手术的临床效果及对免疫功能的影响。方法 选取2020年1月至2022年12月南阳市中心医院收治的82例需要进行胃癌D2根治术的患者为研究对象。根据手术方式分为减孔组与多孔组,每组41例。减孔组使用减孔腹腔镜进行胃癌D2根治术,多孔组使用常规多孔腹腔镜进行胃癌D2根治术。比较两组临床治疗效果,包括术中相关指标(手术时间、术中出血量、腹部切口长度、清扫淋巴结数量)、术后相关指标(镇痛剂使用次数、排气时间、住院时间)、并发症发生情况,在术前和术后应用流式细胞仪检测和记录免疫功能相关指标(CD4+、CD8+、CD4+/CD8+)并进行比较。结果 减孔组手术时间和清扫淋巴结个数均显著高于多孔组,但减孔组术中出血量和腹部切口长度均显著低于多孔组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0。05)。减孔组镇痛剂使用次数显著少于多孔组,且住院时间短于多孔组,但排气时间长于多孔组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0。05)。两组并发症发生情况比较差异未见统计学意义(x2=0。213,P=0。644>0。05)。术前,两组CD4+、CD8+及CD4+/CD8+水平比较,差异未见统计学意义(P>0。05)。术后,减孔组CD4+、CD8+及CD4+/CD8+水平明显高于多孔组,差异有统计学意义(P<0。05)。结论 减孔腹腔镜比常规多孔腹腔镜胃癌D2根治术的临床治疗效果更好,并且对患者免疫功能的影响更小。
Comparison of clinical efficacy of reduced port versus multiport laparoscopy-assisted D2 radical distal gastrectomy
Objective To compare the clinical efficacy and impact on immune function between reduced aperture laparoscopic and conventional porous laparoscopic D2 radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer.Methods Eighty-two patients who underwent D2 radical surgery for gastric cancer admitted to Nanyang Central Hospital from January 2020 to December 2022 were selected as the research subjects.According to the surgical method,they were divided into a reduced pore group and a porous group,with 41 cases in each group.The reduced pore group underwent D2 radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer using reduced pore laparoscopy,while the porous group underwent D2 radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer using conventional porous laparoscopy.The clinical treatment outcomes of two groups,including intraoperative related indicators(surgical time,surgical bleeding volume,abdominal incision length,number of lymph nodes cleaned),postoperative related indicators(number of analgesics used,exhaust time,hospital stay),and incidence of complications were compared.The immunofunctional indicators(CD4+,CD8+,CD4+/CD8+)were measured and compared by flow cytometry before and after surgery.Results The surgical time and number of lymph nodes cleaned in the reduced orifice group were significantly higher than those in the porous group,but the intraoperative blood loss and abdominal incision length in the reduced orifice group were significantly lower than those in the porous group(P<0.05).The use of analgesic drugs in the reducing pore group was significantly less than that in the porous group,and the hospitalization time was shorter than that of the porous group,but the exhaust time was longer than that of the porous group(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups(x2=0.213,P=0.644>0.05).Before surgery,there was no significant difference in the levels of CD4+,CD8+,and CD4+/CD8+between the two groups(P>0.05).After surgery,the CD4+,CD8+,and CD4+/CD8+levels in the reduced pore group were significantly higher than those in the porous group(P<0.05).Conclusions Compared with conventional porous laparoscopic D2 radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer,reduced-orifice laparoscopy has better clinical therapeutic effect and less influence on the immune function of patients.

Reduce holesPorousLaparoscopyD2 radical operation for gastric cancerEffect

景小松、王耿泽、廖珍、裴正浩、郝阳

展开 >

河南省南阳市中心医院普通外科胃肠一病区 473000

河南省南阳市中心医院消化肿瘤科 473000

减孔 多孔 腹腔镜 胃癌D2根治手术 效果

2024

临床医学
中华医学会河南分会

临床医学

影响因子:0.906
ISSN:1003-3548
年,卷(期):2024.44(3)
  • 17